The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny
Abstract
The nuclear small subunit rRNA (18S) has played a dominant role in the estimation of relationships among insect orders from molecular data. In previous studies, 18S sequences have been aligned by unadjusted automated approaches (computer alignments that are not manually readjusted), most recently with direct optimization (simultaneous alignment and tree building using a program called "POY"). Parsimony has been the principal optimality criterion. Given the problems associated with the alignment of rRNA, and the recent availability of the doublet model for the analysis of covarying sites using Bayesian MCMC analysis, a different approach is called for in the analysis of these data. In this paper, nucleotide sequence data from the 18S small subunit rRNA gene of insects are aligned manually with reference to secondary structure, and analyzed under Bayesian phylogenetic methods with both GTR+I+G and doublet models in MrBayes. A credible phylogeny of Insecta is recovered that is independent of the morphological data and (unlike many other analyses of 18S in insects) not contradictory to traditional ideas of insect ordinal relationships based on morphology. Hexapoda, including Collembola, are monophyletic. Paraneoptera are the sister taxon to a monophyletic Holometabola but weakly supported. Ephemeroptera are supported as the sister taxon of Neoptera, and this result is interpreted with respect to the evolution of direct sperm transfer and the evolution of flight. Many other relationships are well-supported but several taxa remain problematic, e.g., there is virtually no support for relationships among orthopteroid orders. A website is made available that provides aligned 18S data in formats that include structural symbols and Nexus formats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
(1986) · Cited by 2,570
Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses
Yang, Z. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10041-0 · Cited by 1,209
Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00178256 · Cited by 1,076
(1993) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040082 · Cited by 1,036
Whiting, M. F., Carpenter, J. C., Wheeler, Q. D., & Wheeler, W. C. (1997) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/46.1.1 · Cited by 913
Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective
Gutell, R. R., Larsen, N. E., & Woese, C. R. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.58.1.10-26.1994 · Cited by 723
Cited by
Insect Mitochondrial Genomics: Implications for Evolution and Phylogeny
Cameron, S. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162007 · Cited by 1,443
A Total-Evidence Approach to Dating with Fossils, Applied to the Early Radiation of the Hymenoptera
Ronquist, F., Klopfstein, S., Vilhelmsen, L., Schulmeister, S., Murray, D. L., & Rasnitsyn, A. P. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys058 · Cited by 930
Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?
Colman, D. R., Toolson, E. C., & Takacs‐Vesbach, C. D. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05752.x · Cited by 580
Model Selection in Phylogenetics
Sullivan, J., & Joyce, P. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152633 · Cited by 412
A Phylogenomic Approach to Resolve the Arthropod Tree of Life
Meusemann, K., von Reumont, B. M., Simon, S., Roeding, F., Strauss, S., Kuck, P., Ebersberger, I., Walzl, M., Pass, G., Breuers, S., et al. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq130 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Kjer, K. M.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2148108676
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10635150490445922
- The paper
- Kjer, K. M. (2004). Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490445922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.