Identifying and Removing Fast-Evolving Sites Using Compatibility Analysis: An Example from the Arthropoda
Abstract
Felsenstein (1978) first recognized that long branch attraction (LBA) can seriously affect the accuracy of phylogenetic reconstruction. Although Felsenstein specifically addressed this problem in the cases of parsimony and clique analyses, it is now known that LBA can affect any tree reconstruction method, including maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian approaches. However, LBA is only a problem for distance, ML, and Bayesian methods when the assumed substitution model is underparameterized, i.e., when it is unrealistically simple (Swofford et al., 2001; Lemmon and Moriatry, 2004). LBA should therefore be avoidable by analyzing the data using ML, Bayesian, or distance methods under the best-fitting substitution model (providing this is a good approximation of the true substitution model). However, ML and (although to a much lesser extent) Bayesian analyses are time consuming, whereas many widely used implementations of distance methods (for example Kumar et al., 2001) do not allow the specification of complex substitution models. Accordingly, estimating the relationships of fast-evolving species still represents one of the most serious problems of molecular phylogenetics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The low support for Cnidaria and Deuterostomia is probably owing to long-branch artefacts associated with Ciona and Obelia.
“Support for Cnidaria and Deuterostomia was low (67 and 33%, respectively), probably owing to long-branch artefacts (Pisani 2004) associated with Ciona and Obelia in particular”
From The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records (2008) · cites this paper as Pisani 2004
Cites
Modeling compositional heterogeneity
Foster, P. G. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490445779 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
The importance of proper model assumption in bayesian phylogenetics.
Lemmon, A. R., & Moriarty, E. C. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490423520 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1603 · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works
Philippe, H., Lartillot, N., & Brinkmann, H. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi111 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
“Such data removal methods (Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Lopez, Forterre, and Philippe 1999; Pisani 2004) are well suited for phylogenomic analyses because the remaining data set is sufficiently large to yield highly supported results.”
MethodPeterson, K. J., Cotton, J. A., Gehling, J. G., & Pisani, D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2233 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
“Support for Cnidaria and Deuterostomia was low (67 and 33%, respectively), probably owing to long-branch artefacts (Pisani 2004) associated with Ciona and Obelia in particular (indeed the value for Deuterostomia increases to more than 90% with the removal of Ciona), but given the clear monophyly of the phyla Chordata…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPhilippe, H., Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Lartillot, N. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130205 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
An Empirical Assessment of Long-Branch Attraction Artefacts in Deep Eukaryotic Phylogenomics
Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M., Zhou, Y., de Raucourt, G. P., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500234609 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“A positional approach (Brinkmann and Philippe, 1999; Burleigh and Mathews, 2004; Pisani, 2004) could provide a better performance because it would more specifically remove the positions that mainly contain nonphylogenetic signal.”
MethodKumar, S., Skjæveland, Å., Orr, R. J. S., Enger, P., Ruden, T., Mevik, B.-H., Burki, F., Botnen, A., & Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-357 · Cited by 241
“Reducing such stochastic errors is an important step in improving the phylogenetic resolution of the sequence data [16,19-21].”
BackgroundWhy are there so many insect species? Perspectives from fossils and phylogenies
Mayhew, P. J. (2007) · Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00018.x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“Biological Reviews 82 (2007) 425–454 2007 The Author Journal compilation 2007 Cambridge Philosophical Society Several recent phylogenetic studies have suggested that the Entognatha might have originated independently from Crustacea (Nardi et al., 2003; Giribet et al., 2004; Pisani, 2004).”
InfluentialThe evolution of the Ecdysozoa
Telford, M. J., Bourlat, S., Economou, A. D., Papillon, D., & Rota-Stabelli, O. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2243 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“We find that, in contrast to previous studies that had used more distant out-groups (lophotrochozoans ), our mitochondrial tree narrowly supports Mandibulata over Myriochelata (figure 1; see also Pisani 2004).”
ResultSupertrees Disentangle the Chimerical Origin of Eukaryotic Genomes
Pisani, D., Cotton, J. A., & McInerney, J. O. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm095 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“Because of the dimensions of our data sets, we could not implement methods to attempt countering Long Branch Attraction (LBA; e.g., Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Pisani 2004).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPitfalls in supermatrix phylogenomics
Philippe, H., Vienne, D. M. D., Ranwez, V., Roure, B., Baurain, D., & Delsuc, F. (2017) · European Journal of Taxonomy · doi:10.5852/ejt.2017.283 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“6 really problematic for phylogenomic inference, since removal of fast-evolving characters/species is commonly carried out to reduce tree-reconstruction artefacts (e.g., Brinkmann & Philippe 1999; Pisani 2004; Brinkmann et al. 2005).”
Sperling, E. A., Peterson, K. J., & Pisani, D. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp148 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
“…phylogenetic analyses (particularly those inferred usingMP, NJ, and CATGTR), and a Slow–Fast (Brinkmann and Philippe 1999) based site-stripping protocol (see also Pisani 2004) to further investigate the possibility that clades potentially supported by our data set could be phylogenetic artifacts.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCoalescent versus Concatenation Methods and the Placement of Amborella as Sister to Water Lilies
Xi, Z., Liu, L., Rest, J. S., & Davis, C. “. (2014) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu055 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
“This can be especially prominent in resolving deeper relationships (Brinkmann and Philippe, 1999; Hirt et al., 1999; Philippe et al., 2000; Gribaldo and Philippe, 2002; Burleigh and Mathews, 2004; Pisani, 2004; Brinkmann et al., 2005; Goremykin et al., 2009, 2010; Philippe and Roure, 2011; Zhong et al., 2011; Xi et al…”
BackgroundEcdysozoan Mitogenomics: Evidence for a Common Origin of the Legged Invertebrates, the Panarthropoda
Rota-Stabelli, O., Kayal, E., Gleeson, D., Daub, J., Boore, J., Telford, M. J., Pisani, D., Blaxter, M., & Lavrov, D. (2010) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evq030 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“…doi:10.1093/gbe/evq030 Advance Access publication May 30, 2010 435 Because these sites are most likely to be misleading (Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Pisani 2004; Sperling et al. 2009; Castoe et al. 2009), this result confirms that a Chelicerata affinity for the Tardigrada is unlikely to be…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSong, F., Li, H., Jiang, P., Zhou, X. J., Liu, J., Sun, C., Vogler, A. P., & Cai, W. (2016) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw086 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Noisy: Identification of problematic columns in multiple sequence alignments
Dress, A., Flamm, C., Fritzsch, G., Grünewald, S., Kruspe, M., Prohaska, S., & Stadler, P. (2008) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-3-7 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“Consequently, sites that have more incompatibilities than random sites are removed from the alignment [9].”
BackgroundCummins, C. A., & McInerney, J. O. (2011) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr064 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“Many different methods exist for the identification of sites with a high substitution rate (Farris 1969; Kuhner and Felsenstein 1994; Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Hansmann and Martin 2000; Schmidt et al. 2002; Pisani 2004).”
MethodKlimov, P. B., OConnor, B. M., Chetverikov, P. E., Bolton, S. J., Pepato, A. R., Mortazavi, A., Tolstikov, A. V., Bauchan, G. R., & Ochoa, R. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.017 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Clerck, O. D., Leliaert, F., Verbruggen, H., Lane, C. E., Paula, J. C. D., Payo, D. A., & Coppejans, E. (2006) · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00279.x · Cited by 126
“The optimal models of nucleotide substitution for ML were determined in Modeltest 3.6 according to the Akaike Information Criterion (Posada and Crandall 1998, Posada and Buckley 2004).”
MethodInfluentialXu, W., Jameson, D., Tang, B., & Higgs, P. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-005-0246-5 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“An alternative possibility that cannot be ruled out is thatMyriapoda is a sister group to Pancrustacea and that Chelicerata branches prior to this (Giribet et al. 2001; Pisani 2004).”
BackgroundUndinarchaeota illuminate DPANN phylogeny and the impact of gene transfer on archaeal evolution
Dombrowski, N., Williams, T. A., Sun, J., Woodcroft, B. J., Lee, J.-H., Minh, B. Q., Rinke, C., & Spang, A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17408-w · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Rota-Stabelli, O., & Telford, M. J. (2008) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.033 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“Analyses of nuclear coding genes (Regier et al., 2005) do not support either hypotheses, but compatibility analyses using elongation factor 1a tend to support Mandibulata (Pisani, 2004).”
Montgelard, C., Forty, E. J., Arnal, V., & Matthee, C. A. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-321 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“To avoid these pitfalls, some authors [34,37,39] emphasize the necessity to test the quality and”
BackgroundIdentifying cliques of convergent characters: concerted evolution in the cormorants and shags.
Holland, B., Spencer, H., Worthy, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq023 · Cited by 80
Pisani, D., Feuda, R., Peterson, K., & Smith, A. B. T. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.028 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Pisani et al. /Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 27–34”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe evolutionary root of flowering plants.
Goremykin, V., Nikiforova, S., Biggs, P., Zhong, B.-J., Delange, P., Martin, W., Woetzel, S., Atherton, R., Mclenachan, P., & Lockhart, P. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys070 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Numerous methods for sorting, identifying, and removing fast sites have been suggested, and the impact of removal of the fastest evolving sites on phylogenetic reconstruction is well known (e.g., Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Hirt et al. 1999; Lopez et al. 1999; Ruiz-Trillo et al. 1999; Hansmann and Martin 2000; Burlei…”
Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
Xi, Z., Rest, J., & Davis, C. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080870 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“can lead to multiple substitutions at the same site [61,62], which can be especially misleading for resolving deeper relationships if the substitution model fails to correct for high levels of saturation in fast-evolving sites [24,62-68].”
BackgroundCongruence of Morphological and Molecular Phylogenies
Pisani, D., Benton, M. J., & Wilkinson, M. (2007) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“For molecular data, systematic errors resulting from, for example, long-branch attraction (Pisani 2004), patterns of codon usage, and base composition biases (Swofford et al. 1996) may affect different genes, sometime all the genes, of a given taxon (Driskell et al. 2004).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMolecular paleobiological insights into the origin of the Brachiopoda
Sperling, E., Pisani, D., & Peterson, K. J. (2011) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2011.00480.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated Removal of Noisy Data in Phylogenomic Analyses
Goremykin, V., Nikiforova, S., & Bininda-Emonds, O. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-010-9398-z · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“removal of noisy alignment positions have already been suggested (e.g. Brinkmann and Philippe 1999; Hirt et al. 1999; Lopez et al. 1999; Ruiz-Trillo et al. 1999; Burleigh and Mathews 2004; Pisani 2004; Kostka et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRoure, B., & Philippe, H. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-17 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“First, since a correlation exists between evolutionary rate and heteropecilly (Tables 1 and 2), improvements in phylogenetic inference could be due to the removal of fast evolving sites [12,53].”
BackgroundIdentification of Conserved Indels that are Useful for Classification and Evolutionary Studies
Gupta, R. S. (2014) · Methods in microbiology · doi:10.1016/bs.mim.2014.05.003 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Redmond, A. K., Zou, J., Secombes, C. J., Macqueen, D. J., & Dooley, H. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01558 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Fortunately, it can often be counteracted by breaking long branches with additional taxa (43–45), applying site-heterogeneous models of evolution (42, 46), removing fast-evolving sites (47), and/or identifying the best outgroup (48–51), in addition to using outgroupfree methods (41, 52–55) to root the tree.”
MethodBhandari, V., & Gupta, R. S. (2015) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-015-0571-7 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Bhandari, V., & Gupta, R. S. (2013) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-013-0062-7 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“The character compatibility analysis removes all homoplasic and fast-evolving characters from the dataset to identify the largest clique(s) of characters which are completely compatible with each other (Estabrook et al. 1976; Pisani 2004; Gupta and Sneath 2007).”
MethodHolton, T. A., & Pisani, D. (2010) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evq016 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“…sampling (see also Halanych 2004), which can exacerbate phylogenetic artifacts, particularly long-branch attraction (LBA), in the presence of a fast-evolving species such as C. elegans (e.g., Pisani 2004; Delsuc et al. 2005; Philippe et al. 2005; Jeffroy et al. 2006; Sperling et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAnimal phylogeny and large-scale sequencing: progress and pitfalls
Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2008) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1002.2008.08038 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Alternatively, one can use a compatibility approach to improve the quality of the input data without any a priori knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships (Pisani, 2004; Qiu & Estabrook, 2008).”
MethodSeed plant phylogeny: gnetophytes are derived conifers and a sister group to Pinaceae.
Hajibabaei, M., Xia, J., & Drouin, G. (2006) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.006 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“It can be used to identify fast evolving, incompatible sites within genes, and their partitions (Pisani, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodThe Root of Flowering Plants and Total Evidence
Goremykin, V. V., Nikiforova, S. V., Cavalieri, D., Pindo, M., & Lockhart, P. J. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv028 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Sources of Signal in 62 Protein-Coding Nuclear Genes for Higher-Level Phylogenetics of Arthropods
Regier, J. C., & Zwick, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023408 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Qu, X., Jin, J., Chaw, S., Li, D.-Z., & Yi, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41005 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
New insights on the sister lineage of percomorph fishes with an anchored hybrid enrichment dataset.
Dornburg, A., Townsend, J., Brooks, W. R., Spriggs, E., Eytan, R., Moore, J., Wainwright, P., Lemmon, A., Lemmon, E., & Near, T. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.02.017 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Gupta, R. S., & Sneath, P. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-006-0082-2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“…for a variety of applications including ranking or weighting characters, identifying and removing fastevolving sites or problematic taxa from phylogenetic analysis (Pisani 2004), ordering multistate characters, and building supertrees based on matrix representation of trees (Wilkinson et al. 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe mouth, the anus, and the blastopore—open questions about questionable openings
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Assessing Systematic Error in the Inference of Seed Plant Phylogeny
Burleigh, J. G., & Mathews, S. (2007) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/509588 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Bleidorn, C. (2017) · Cambridge International Law Journal · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54064-1 · Cited by 36
Jones, K. E., Fér, T., Schmickl, R., Dikow, R. B., Funk, V. A., Herrando‐Moraira, S., Johnston, P. R., Kilian, N., Siniscalchi, C. M., Susanna, A., et al. (2019) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.11295 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Picris is a relatively recent (~5.23 mya) and rapidly evolving genus that has likely accumulated multiple mutations, which tend to be saturated, and this likely contributes to the impact of long-branch attraction in ML analyses (Pisani, 2004).”
InfluentialTekle, Y. I., Anderson, O., Katz, L. A., Maurer-Alcalá, X., Romero, M., & Molestina, R. (2016) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.029 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Koch, N. M., & Gauthier, J. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202729 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gupta, R. S., Naushad, S., Chokshi, C., Griffiths, E., & Adeolu, M. (2015) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-015-0532-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“…approach is a method of phylogenetic reconstruction which is more resistant to noise generated by uninformative, fast-evolving and homoplasic characters than traditional phylogenetic reconstructionmethods (Pisani 2004; Gupta and Sneath 2007; Yin-Long and Estabrook 2008; Holland et al. 2010).”
MethodEco‐evolutionary evidence for the global diversity pattern of Cycas (Cycadaceae)
Liu, J., Lindström, A. J., Gong, Y., Dong, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., & Gong, X. (2024) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13638 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Signal Dissection Identifies the Root of Starfishes
Feuda, R., & Smith, A. B. T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123331 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Genomic, phylogenetic, and cell biological insights into metazoan origins
Nichols, S. A., Dayel, M. J., & King, N. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
How Well Does Your Phylogenetic Model Fit Your Data?
Shepherd, D. A., & Klaere, S. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy066 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Ruano-Rubio, V., & Fares, M. A. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150601175578 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“, 2004), on highly divergent or even random sites (Brinkmann and Philippe, 1999; Pisani, 2004; Susko et al., 2005), or without restriction to any of those two extremes (Chang, 1996;”
BackgroundMethodFleming, J. F., Feuda, R., Roberts, N. W., & Pisani, D. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa015 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Opsin-like sequences have also been found in Placozoa, known as placopsins (Feuda et al. 2012, 2014), though opsins and opsin-like sequences are currently unknown in sponges (Plachetzki et al. 2007; Feuda et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMontgelard, C., & Matthee, C. (2012) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2012.02.001 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Of mites and millipedes: Recent progress in resolving the base of the arthropod tree
Caravas, J., & Friedrich, M. (2010) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Further investigation of single-gene nuclear data sets either supported the Myriochelata [24] or pointed to weak support for the Mandibulata [25], and an analysis of concatenated HOX gene sequences gave a consistent signal that joinedmyriapods with chelicerates to the exclusion of pancrustacean groups [6].”
ResultBuckner, J., Ellingson, R. A., Gold, D., Jones, T., & Jacobs, D. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.008 · Cited by 18
“It is not uncommon to omit such rapidly evolving sites from phylogenetic analyses (Pisani, 2004), a procedure analogous to (but more precise than) choosing loci based on the optimal rate of molecular evolution for a given phylogeny.”
MethodInfluentialPisani, D., Carton, R., Campbell, L. I., Akanni, W. A., Mulville, E., & Rota‐Stabelli, O. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36160-9_3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationSources of Error and Incongruence in Phylogenomic Analyses
Bleidorn, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54064-1_9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Rivera-Rivera, C. J., & Montoya‐Burgos, J. I. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw043 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“An alternative approach is to remove data that are deemed unfit for analysis, such as data from fast-evolving sites (e.g., Pisani 2004; Rodr ıguez-Ezpeleta et al. 2007; Goremykin et al. 2013), fast-evolving genes from multi-gene datasets (Brinkmann et al. 2005), and fast-evolving taxa (e.g.,…”
BackgroundA Method of Alignment Masking for Refining the Phylogenetic Signal of Multiple Sequence Alignments
Rajan, V. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss264 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“We have designed a new approach to alignment masking based on the idea of extracting phylogenetic information from subsplits.”
BackgroundMethodSpectral partitioning of phylogenetic data sets based on compatibility.
Chen, D., Burleigh, G. J., & Fernández-Baca, D. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701499571 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Perhaps most similar to our methods, Pisani (2004) used compatibility to identify the fastest evolving sites using a randomization test that compares a character's observed overall pairwise compatibility with the overall pairwise compatibility that would be expected if the states of the character states were random.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZhang, L., Wu, W., Yan, H., & Ge, X. (2015) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.4137/ebo.s22448 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Universal orthologs infer deep phylogenies and improve genome quality assessments
Alam, M. N. U., Román‐Palacios, C., Copetti, D., & Wing, R. A. (2025) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02328-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Slow evolving sites have been favored throughout the history of molecular phylogenetics [50].”
The Rise of Statistical Phylogenetics
Holland, B. R. (2013) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/anzs.12035 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Other authors have worried that this approach is too circular and that attempts should be made to identify the least reliable sites independently © 2013 Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc. of tree topology (Pisani 2004; Goremykin, Nikiforova & Bininda-Emonds 2010.”
BackgroundQiu, Y.-L., & Estabrook, G. (2008) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1002.2008.07165 · Cited by 8
Kück, P., Wilkinson, M., Groß, C., Foster, P. G., & Wägele, J. W. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183393 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhao, D., Zhang, S., Chen, J., Zhao, J., An, P., & Xiang, H. (2024) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1093/ismejo/wrad033 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Apparently, when the intermediate lineage has not been discovered, it will be an effective approach to select unambiguously aligned sites (same as removing highly variable sites) to estimate phylogenetic relationships in many cases [70–72], but this might not be suitable for Halobacteria .”
Current Approaches to Phylogenomic Reconstruction
Baurain, D., & Philippe, H. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470570418.ch2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fifty years of character compatibility concepts at work
Estabrook, G. (2008) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1002.2008.07166 · Cited by 5
PhyIN: trimming alignments by phylogenetic incompatibilities among neighbouring sites
Maddison, W. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.18504 · Cited by 4
Sun, X.-Y., & Cheng, J. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12111705 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Laimeheriwa, B. M., Khouw, A., Yl, N., & Limmon, G. (2018) · doi:10.4172/2155-9910.1000249 · Cited by 3
“The unit of measure used for the purposes of taxonomy and identification is a measure of comparison, whereas for the assessment and monitoring of individual conditions and status are used units of absolute size [134,135].”
MethodEvaluating the Impact of Purifying Selection on Species-level Molecular DatingPreprint
He, C., Liang, D., & Zhang, P. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/622209 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“It is reasonable to remove those genes/sites with exceptionally fast rates from data 506 because the fast rates of these genes/sites may result from positive selection or mutational 507 hotspots (Pisani 2004; Zheng et al. 2004).”
BackgroundLi, L.-Y., Barido-Sottani, J., & Silvestro, D. (2026) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2026.108557 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Undinarchaeota illuminate the evolution of DPANN archaeaPreprint
Dombrowski, N., Williams, T., Sun, J., Woodcroft, B., Lee, J.-H., Bui, M., Rinke, C., & Spang, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.03.05.976373 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Systematic bias undermines mitochondrial phylogenomics of deep divergences of Diptera
Kabiraj, D., & Basumatary, P. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-63009-w
Fleming, J. F., & Struck, T. H. (2026) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syag009 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…and methods exist to ameliorate it, these methods are often limited in scope, not comparable between dissimilar data sets ( Quesne 1969 ; Pisani 2004 ; Lartillot et al. 2009 ; Xia and Lemey 2009 ; Kück and Struck 2014 ; Jermiin and Misof 2020 ; Duchêne et al. 2022 ; Foster et al. 2023 )…”
Pending Issues in Development and Phylogeny of Arthropods: From Genes to Transitions
Deutsch, J. (2010) · Science Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1201/b10425-6
ZOONET: perspectives on the evolution of animal form. Meeting report
Fischer, A., Arboleda, E., Egger, B., Hilbrant, M., McGregor, A. P., Cole, A. G., & Daley, A. C. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21294
- Authors
- Pisani, D.
- Affiliations
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pisani, Davide
- ORCID
- Pisani, Davide
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 978-989
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2137032400
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- long-branch attraction, compatibility assessment, arthropods, substitution models, phylogenetic inference, molecular phylogeny, distance method, maximum likelihood estimation, Bayesian phylogenetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Models, Theoretical, Phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review