The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polytomies and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference
Abstract
Bayesian phylogenetic analyses are now very popular in systematics and molecular evolution because they allow the use of much more realistic models than currently possible with maximum likelihood methods. There are, however, a growing number of examples in which large Bayesian posterior clade probabilities are associated with very short branch lengths and low values for non-Bayesian measures of support such as nonparametric bootstrapping. For the four-taxon case when the true tree is the star phylogeny, Bayesian analyses become increasingly unpredictable in their preference for one of the three possible resolved tree topologies as data set size increases. This leads to the prediction that hard (or near-hard) polytomies in nature will cause unpredictable behavior in Bayesian analyses, with arbitrary resolutions of the polytomy receiving very high posterior probabilities in some cases. We present a simple solution to this problem involving a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that allows exploration of all of tree space, including unresolved tree topologies with one or more polytomies. The reversible-jump MCMC approach allows prior distributions to place some weight on less-resolved tree topologies, which eliminates misleadingly high posteriors associated with arbitrary resolutions of hard polytomies. Fortunately, assigning some prior probability to polytomous tree topologies does not appear to come with a significant cost in terms of the ability to assess the level of support for edges that do exist in the true tree. Methods are discussed for applying arbitrary prior distributions to tree topologies of varying resolution, and an empirical example showing evidence of polytomies is analyzed and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
Bayesian Selection of Continuous-Time Markov Chain Evolutionary Models
Suchard, M. A., Weiss, R. E., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003872 · Cited by 791
Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets.
Buckley, T. R. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290069922 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Ultrafast Approximation for Phylogenetic Bootstrap
Minh, B. Q., Nguyen, M. A. T., & von Haeseler, A. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst024 · Cited by 4,844
Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative
Anisimova, M., & Gascuel, O. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600755453 · Cited by 2,693
The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates
Heath, T. A., Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Stadler, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319091111 · Cited by 834
Total-Evidence Dating under the Fossilized Birth–Death Process
Zhang, C., Stadler, T., Klopfstein, S., Heath, T. A., & Ronquist, F. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv080 · Cited by 419
Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2005) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150590945313 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, P. O., Holder, M. T., & Holsinger, K. E.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-253
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2147021949
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polytomies and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10635150590924208
- The paper
- Lewis, P. O., Holder, M. T., & Holsinger, K. E. (2005). Polytomies and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590924208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.