Cited by 323Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogenyPlant Diversity and Evolution

Detecting and Overcoming Systematic Errors in Genome-Scale Phylogenies

Open access
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara, Brinkmann, Henner, Roure, Béatrice, Lartillot, Nicolas, Lang, B. Franz, Philippe, Hervé·2007·Systematic Biology

Abstract

Genome-scale data sets result in an enhanced resolution of the phylogenetic inference by reducing stochastic errors. However, there is also an increase of systematic errors due to model violations, which can lead to erroneous phylogenies. Here, we explore the impact of systematic errors on the resolution of the eukaryotic phylogeny using a data set of 143 nuclear-encoded proteins from 37 species. The initial observation was that, despite the impressive amount of data, some branches had no significant statistical support. To demonstrate that this lack of resolution is due to a mutual annihilation of phylogenetic and nonphylogenetic signals, we created a series of data sets with slightly different taxon sampling. As expected, these data sets yielded strongly supported but mutually exclusive trees, thus confirming the presence of conflicting phylogenetic and nonphylogenetic signals in the original data set. To decide on the correct tree, we applied several methods expected to reduce the impact of some kinds of systematic error. Briefly, we show that (i) removing fast-evolving positions, (ii) recoding amino acids into functional categories, and (iii) using a site-heterogeneous mixture model (CAT) are three effective means of increasing the ratio of phylogenetic to nonphylogenetic signal. Finally, our results allow us to formulate guidelines for detecting and overcoming phylogenetic artefacts in genome-scale phylogenetic analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10635150701397643

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 323

Authors
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N., Brinkmann, H., Roure, B., Lartillot, N., Lang, B. F., & Philippe, H.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Centre Robert Cedergren, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada E-mail: Herve.Philippe@UMontreal.CA (H.P.)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Philippe, Hervé
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
389-399
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2168198916
Cited by
323
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Genome Canada
  • Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
systematic errors, genome-scale phylogeny, eukaryotic phylogeny, nuclear-encoded proteins, phylogenetic signal, taxon sampling, cat model
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Classification, Phylogeny, Selection Bias, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review