Cited by 101Marine and fisheries researchSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesCensus and Population Estimation

Review of Statistical Aspects of Survey Sampling for Marine Fisheries

Kimura, Daniel K., Somerton, David A.·2006·Reviews in Fisheries Science

Abstract

Fishery surveys are an essential ingredient of modern fisheries stock assessment. To understand this, one must understand that the survey time series are the essential anchor that makes modern fishery stock assessment modeling possible. Without fishery surveys, fisheries stock assessment scientists would have great difficulty modeling absolute abundance, and therefore agencies would have difficulty setting levels of allowable catch. In this review, we explore the basic assumptions that need to be fulfilled for valid surveys to be accomplished. Although these assumptions are generally well understood, the complexity of survey sampling gear and the complexity of target animal behavior makes them difficult to fulfill in practice and can easily lead to problems when interpreting survey results from even the most carefully designed survey. In reviewing the literature surrounding fishery surveys, their sampling design, modeling, and methods of analysis, it became clear that fisheries scientists have long been preoccupied with coping with the intense variability found in fish catches. This variability is found within fishing hauls, between hauls, between area, time and depth strata. Coping with this variability, which is due to animal behavior, habitat variation, and the nature of fishing gear, will be a constant theme that ties together our review.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10641260600621761

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Samples within each invasion area may have varied across years with respect to some spatial or temporal pattern of sampling or with fluctuations in environmental conditions.

    “samples within each invasion area may have varied across years with respect to some spatial or temporal pattern of sampling or with fluctuations in environmental conditions34.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 101

Authors
Kimura, D. K., & Somerton, D. A.
Affiliations
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Published
2006-09
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
245-283
ISSN
  • 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6553
OpenAlex
W2031792916
Cited by
101
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
Keywords
fisheries survey, survey sampling design, catch variability, fishing gear selectivity, allowable catch, survey data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review