Review of Statistical Aspects of Survey Sampling for Marine Fisheries
Abstract
Fishery surveys are an essential ingredient of modern fisheries stock assessment. To understand this, one must understand that the survey time series are the essential anchor that makes modern fishery stock assessment modeling possible. Without fishery surveys, fisheries stock assessment scientists would have great difficulty modeling absolute abundance, and therefore agencies would have difficulty setting levels of allowable catch. In this review, we explore the basic assumptions that need to be fulfilled for valid surveys to be accomplished. Although these assumptions are generally well understood, the complexity of survey sampling gear and the complexity of target animal behavior makes them difficult to fulfill in practice and can easily lead to problems when interpreting survey results from even the most carefully designed survey. In reviewing the literature surrounding fishery surveys, their sampling design, modeling, and methods of analysis, it became clear that fisheries scientists have long been preoccupied with coping with the intense variability found in fish catches. This variability is found within fishing hauls, between hauls, between area, time and depth strata. Coping with this variability, which is due to animal behavior, habitat variation, and the nature of fishing gear, will be a constant theme that ties together our review.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Samples within each invasion area may have varied across years with respect to some spatial or temporal pattern of sampling or with fluctuations in environmental conditions.
“samples within each invasion area may have varied across years with respect to some spatial or temporal pattern of sampling or with fluctuations in environmental conditions34.”
From Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale (2016) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Kimura, D. K., & Somerton, D. A.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Reviews in Fisheries Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-283
- ISSN
- 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6553
- OpenAlex
- W2031792916
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- fisheries survey, survey sampling design, catch variability, fishing gear selectivity, allowable catch, survey data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review