Cited by 51Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesMarine and fisheries research

Status of Bluefin Tuna Farming, Broodstock Management, Breeding and Fingerling Production in Japan

Masuma, Shukei, Miyashita, Shigeru, Yamamoto, Hiroshi, Kumai, Hidemi·2008·Reviews in Fisheries Science

Abstract

Development of bluefin tuna farming in Japan has a 30-year history. This paper reviews recent developments as well as the current status and problems of farming, broodstock management, and fingerling production in Japan. Farmed bluefin tuna by wild seed-stock comprises approximately 15–20% (2,400 tons) of the annual catch of bluefin in Japan. Comparisons among farms in Japan indicate that bluefin tuna growth is positively correlated with annual water temperature. Broodstock commence spawning at approximately 3–5 years of age, and eggs are collected from within the cages. The number of bluefin tuna eggs collected in Japan has varied greatly—between zero and about 500 million—with variance between farms and years. Current larval rearing techniques produce tens of thousands of fingerlings of 35–50 mm per season in Japan, but survival rates are 0.01–4.5%. Although there are the bottlenecks in egg collection and larval rearing under the present technology, the approaches for enhancing bluefin resources and the replacement of wild seed-stock by artificial fingerling to tuna farms have firmly been improving in Japan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10641260701484325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological temperature limits for gonad development and egg development obtained from experiments matched the spatially observed larval temperature tolerance limits well.

    “Physiological temperature limits for biological processes such as gonad development and egg development obtained from experiments (Sawada et al. 2005, Margulies et al. 2007, Masuma et al. 2008) matched the spatially observed larval temperature tolerance limits well.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masuma, S., Miyashita, S., Yamamoto, H., & Kumai, H.
Affiliations
  • Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency (JP)
  • Kindai University (JP)
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
16
Issue
1-3
Pages
385-390
ISSN
  • 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6553
OpenAlex
W2027211394
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, tuna aquaculture, broodstock management, fingerling production, larval rearing, egg collection, larval survival, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review