Cited by 16Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Does short sleep duration in daily life affect morning home blood pressure? Evaluation in Japanese people

Kawabe, Hiroshi, Saito, Ikuo·2008·Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

Abstract

A short sleep duration is expected to elevate blood pressure the next morning, but no report has evaluated this in detail using home blood pressure measurement. In this study, the relation between sleep duration and morning and evening home blood pressure and heart rate during seven consecutive days was evaluated. From 630 volunteers not receiving antihypertensive agents, we selected 478 subjects (318 male, 160 female; mean age: 39.0 years) whose 2-7 days of data consisted of 7-8 hours sleep duration (proper sleep period phase; mean sleep duration: 7.3 +/- 0.3 hours) and less than 7 hours (short sleep period phase; 5.7 +/- 4.9 hours). In the morning, systolic blood pressure and heart rate in the short sleep period phase (117.7 +/- 14.9 mmHg, 67.3 +/- 9.6/min) were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those in the proper sleep period phase (116.9 +/- 14.9 mmHg, 66.5 +/- 9.1/min). However, there was no difference in morning diastolic blood pressure. Although the difference in morning systolic blood pressure had disappeared by the time of measurement before going to bed, the difference in heart rate was maintained (proper sleep period phase: 70.4 +/- 10.2/min, short sleep period phase: 71.7 +/- 10.7/min, p < 0.01). In conclusion, days with sleep duration of less than 7 hours showed higher morning systolic blood pressure and heart rate compared with days with sleep duration between 7 and 8 hours, but no difference was found in diastolic blood pressure. Moreover, although the difference in morning systolic blood pressure had disappeared at night, the difference in heart rate was still maintained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10641960802064575

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reported short sleep and subjectively poor sleep quality have been associated with higher average blood pressure or higher prevalence of hypertension in cross-sectional studies.

    “Self-reported short sleep and subjectively poor sleep quality have been associated with higher average blood pressure or higher prevalence of hypertension in cross-sectional studies [197–203].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 16

Authors
Kawabe, H., & Saito, I.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawabe, Hiroshi
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
Published
2008-01
Volume
30
Issue
3-4
Pages
183-190
ISSN
  • 0148-3927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1064-1963
  • 1525-6006
OpenAlex
W2160977912
Cited by
16
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
short sleep duration, home blood pressure, morning systolic blood pressure, heart rate, hypertension, Japanese adults, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Heart, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Sleep, Systole, Time Factors, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review