Anti-Hypertensive Effect of γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Rich Chlorella on High-Normal Blood Pressure and Borderline Hypertension in Placebo-Controlled Double Blind Study
Abstract
The anti-hypertensive effect of GABA-rich Chlorella was studied after oral administration for 12 weeks in the subjects with high-normal blood pressure and borderline hypertension in the placebo-controlled, double-blind manner in order to investigate if GABA-rich Chlorella, a dietary supplement, is useful in control of blood pressure. Eighty subjects with Systolic blood pressure (SBP) 130-159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 85-99 mmHg (40 subjects/group) took the blinded substance of GABA-rich Chlorella (20 mg as gamma-aminobutyric acid) or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks, and had follow-up observation for an additional 4 weeks. Systolic blood pressure in the subjects given GABA-rich Chlorella significantly decreased compared with placebo (p < 0.01). Diastolic blood pressure had the tendency to decrease after intake of GABA-rich Chlorella. Neither adverse events nor abnormal laboratory findings were reported throughout the study period. Reduction of SBP in the subjects with borderline hypertension was higher than those in the subjects with high-normal blood pressure. These results suggest that GABA-rich Chlorella significantly decreased high-normal blood pressure and borderline hypertension, and is a beneficial dietary supplement for prevention of the development of hypertension.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-term supplementation with Chlorella (approximately 1.5 g/day for up to six months) reduces blood pressure in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive adults, with enhanced effects reported for GABA-enriched formulations.
“Similarly, long-term supplementation with Chlorella (approximately 1.5 g/day for up to six months) has been shown to reduce blood pressure in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive adults, with enhanced effects reported for GABA-enriched formulations [77,78].”
From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Shimada, M., Hasegawa, T., Nishimura, C., Kan, H., Kanno, T., Nakamura, T., & Matsubayashi, T.
- Affiliations
- Toho University (JP)
- Chlorella Industry Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kanno, Toshihiro
- ORCID
- Hasegawa, Takashi
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 342-354
- ISSN
- 0148-3927 (ISSN-L)
- 1064-1963
- 1525-6006
- OpenAlex
- W2165781065
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › GABA and Rice Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Keywords
- GABA, Chlorella, antihypertensive effect, borderline hypertension, high-normal blood pressure, dietary supplements, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Chlorella, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review