Cited by 4,133Advanced oxidation water treatmentEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry

Pignatello, Joseph J., Oliveros, Esther, MacKay, Allison·2006·Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Abstract

Fenton chemistry encompasses reactions of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of iron to generate highly reactive species such as the hydroxyl radical and possibly others. In this review, the complex mechanisms of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions and the important factors influencing these reactions, from both a fundamental and practical perspective, in applications to water and soil treatment, are discussed. The review covers modified versions including the photoassisted Fenton reaction, use of chelated iron, electro-Fenton reactions, and Fenton reactions using heterogeneous catalysts. Sections are devoted to nonclassical pathways, by-products, kinetics and process modeling, experimental design methodology, soil and aquifer treatment, use of Fenton in combination with other advanced oxidation processes or biodegradation, economic comparison with other advanced oxidation processes, and case studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10643380500326564

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Degradation of organic contaminants by AOPs such as UV/H2O2 photolysis, photocatalysis, Fenton, electro-Fenton or cavitation-based methods results in good degradation and mineralization efficiency.

    “The degradation of contaminants and their derivatives by various AOPs, such as UV/H2O2 photolysis, photocatalysis, Fenton, electro-Fenton or cavitation-based methods, etc., resulted in good degradation and mineralization efficiency [11-16].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 322 · Cited by 4,133

Authors
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A.
Affiliations
  • Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2006-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
1-84
ISSN
  • 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6537
OpenAlex
W1983228601
Cited by
4,133
References
322
Citations by year
2026: 285 · 2025: 254 · 2024: 241 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 293 · 2019: 273 · 2018: 290 · 2017: 245 · 2016: 229 · 2015: 191 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 191 · 2012: 150
FWCI
79.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
advanced oxidation processes, Fenton reaction, organic pollutant degradation, hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, iron catalysts, iron chelates, electro-Fenton, heterogeneous catalysts, reaction kinetics, process modeling, soil remediation, biodegradation, economic comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review