Cited by 187Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Organic Amendment on the Biodegradation and Movement of Pesticides

Briceño, Gabriela, Palma, Graciela, Durán, Nelson·2007·Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Abstract

An increase of organic waste coming from different humans and productive activities is a continuous concern, and their application in soil is proposed many times as a solution to disposal problem. In agricultural soil, this practice is actually more popular because of its contribution as a fertilizer and soil enhancement. Recently, increased interest has been focused on assessing the influence of organic waste added to the soil related to pesticides behavior. The studies carried out show that addition of organic matter and nutrient mainly can affect the adsorption, movement, and biodegradation of pesticides. This review shows the factors involved, trend, and result obtained with pesticide behavior in soil amendment. Contradictory trends are reported in the literature on the pesticides' fate. These are mainly because soil type differences, pesticide characteristics, and source amendment are difficult to organize in a tendency pattern, and can significantly complicate the understanding of pesticides fate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10643380600987406

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Barra R., 1999, Ecotox. Environ. Res., 2, 75
  2. Barriuso E., 1996, Etude Gestion Sols, 3, 279
  3. Bolan, N., Adriano, D. and Mora, M. Dynamics and environmental significance of dissolved organic matter in soil. SuperSoil 2004: 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference. December5–92004, Sydney, Australia.
  4. Burton D., 1999, Adv. Pork Prod., 10, 63
  5. Celis R., 1998, J. Environ. Qual., 10, 510
  6. Chambers B., 2001, Managing Livestock Manures, 2005, 25
  7. Chambers B., 2001, Managing Livestoch Manures, Vol. 2005, 25
  8. 1998, Guía para el control y prevención de la contaminación industrial
  9. 2005, Anteproyecto de reglamento para el manejo de lodos no peligrosos generados en plantas de tratamiento de aguas
  10. Cooper B., 1998, Pesticides in Soil, Water and Produce: Analysis, Environmental Monitoring and Remediation, 88
  11. Dabrowska D., 2004, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 13, 617
  12. 2002, Animal by-products regulation (EC) 1774/2002. Department for Environment
  13. Dickerson G., 2000, A sustainable approach to recycling urban and agricultural organic wastes. Guide H-159
  14. Durán N., 1997, Microbiologia Ambiental, 269
  15. Eberle W., 1997, Considerations for direct land application of organic waste products
  16. Encina, F., Briceño, G. and Palma, R. Estimación del riesgo ecológico asociado a pesticidas en la subcuenca del río Traiguén, IX Región-Chile. Proceeding of Latinoamérica SETAC Conference (VI). Buenos Aires, Argentina. pp.28–29.
  17. 2001, Organic contaminants in sewage sludge for agriculture use
  18. Fogarty A., 1991, Microbiol. Rev., 55, 225, 10.1128/MMBR.55.2.225-233.1991 · DOI
  19. Ling W., 2006, Biol. Fertil. Soils
  20. Miller P., 2004, Herbicide Behavior in Soils
  21. Ministerio d a, Agricultura, Pecuária a Abastecimiento
  22. 10.2134/jeq2002.0309 · DOI
  23. Newton G., 1996, Manure Management I. A Nutrient Accounting Approach
  24. Palma, G., López, H., Flores, L., Freer, J. and Baeza, J. Weed control in eucaliptus globulus plantations with granular controlled release herbicide. Proceeding of the Third Brazilian Symposium on the Chemistry of Lignin and Other Wood Components. pp.286–290.
  25. Palma G., 1995, Bol. Sol. Chil. Quim., 40, 129
  26. Palma G., 2002, Bol. Soc. Chil. Quim., 47, 175
  27. Sadzawka A., 2004, Residuos orgánicos y su uso en sistemas agroforestales, 435
  28. Traquair J., 1997, Fungi and Mycorrhizae FAQs
  29. 1998, A Analysis of composting as an Environmental Remediation Technology
  30. 1999, Biosolids generation, use, and disposal in the United States
  31. Varnero T., 2004, Simposio Residuos Orgánicos y su uso en Sistemas Agroforestales, 443
  32. Zagal E., 2002, Agri. Téc., 62, 297

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Briceño, G., Palma, G., & Durán, N.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2007-07
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
233-271
ISSN
  • 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6537
OpenAlex
W2081433978
Cited by
187
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
organic amendments, pesticide degradation, pesticide adsorption, pesticide leaching, pesticide fate in soil, soil organic matter, agricultural soils, organic waste disposal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review