Cited by 177Environmental Chemistry and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery MethodsPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 385 of the 387 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of the Fate of Organic Compounds in the Environment From Their Molecular Properties: A Review

Open access
Mamy, Laure, Patureau, Dominique, Barriuso, Enrique, Bedos, Carole, Bessac, Fabienne, Louchart, Xavier, Martin-laurent, Fabrice, Miege, Cecile, Benoit, Pierre·2015·Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Abstract

hydrophobic behavior (especially through the K OW parameter), adsorption to soils and biodegradation.A lack of QSAR was observed to estimate desorption or potential of transfer to water.Among the 686 molecular descriptors, five were found to be dominant in the 790 collected equations and the most generic ones: four quantumchemical descriptors, the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (E HOMO ) and the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (E LUMO ), polarizability (α) and dipole moment (μ), and one constitutional descriptor, the molecular weight.Keeping in mind that the combination of descriptors belonging to different categories (constitutional, topological, quantum-chemical) led to improve QSAR performances, these descriptors should be considered for the development of new QSAR, for further predictions of environmental parameters.This review also allows finding of the relevant QSAR equations to predict the fate of a wide diversity of compounds in the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10643389.2014.955627

Cites

385 of 385 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 387 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. ChemOffice, 2009, ChemOffice Ultra 12.0 molecular modelling software
  2. Frisch M.J., 2009, Gaussian 09
  3. HyperChem, 2007, Hyperchem 8.0
  4. Kier L.B., 1999, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, 491
  5. Kier L.B., 2002, Croatica Chemica Acta, 75, 371
  6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1992, OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Ready biodegradability
  7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1993, Application of structure-activity relationships to the estimation of properties important in exposure assessment. Environment monograph No 67
  8. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2009, OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Inherent biodegradability: modified MITI test (II), 302 C
  9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013, Introduction to (quantitative) structure activity relationships
  10. Pompe M., 2007, Acta Chimica Slovenica, 54, 605, 10.1021/ci990427t · DOI
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199603)10:2<79::AID-CEM406>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  12. Sabljic A., 1981, Acta Pharmaceutica Jugolsavica, 31, 189
  13. 10.1002/1521-3838(200211)21:5<457::AID-QSAR457>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  14. TORVS Research Team, 1999, Parameter estimation for the treatment of reactivity applications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Mamy, L., Patureau, D., Barriuso, E., Bedos, C., Bessac, F., Louchart, X., Martin-laurent, F., Miege, C., & Benoit, P.
Affiliations
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Mamy, Laure
Venue
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2014-09-09
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
1277-1377
ISSN
  • 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6537
OpenAlex
W2117380901
Cited by
177
References
387
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cemadoc (Cemagref / IRSTEA) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
organic compounds, environmental fate prediction, QSAR, molecular descriptors, octanol-water partition coefficient, soil sorption, biodegradation, desorption, molecular weight, quantum chemical descriptors, topological indices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review