The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy
Open accessAbstract
Agricultural waste is a huge pool of untapped biomass resources that may even represent economic and environmental burdens. They can be converted into bioenergy and bio-based products by cascading conversion processes, within circular economy, and should be considered residual resources. Major challenges are discussed from a transdisciplinary perspective, focused on Europe situation. Environmental and economic consequences of agricultural residue management chains are difficult to assess due to their complexity, seasonality and regionality. Designing multi-criteria decision support tools, applicable at an early-stage of research, is discussed. Improvement of Anaerobic Digestion (AD), one of the most mature conversion technologies, is discussed from a technological point of view and waste feedstock geographical and seasonal variations. Using agricultural residual resources for producing high-value chemicals is a considerable challenge analysed here, taking into account innovative eco-efficient and cost-effective cascading conversion processes (bio-refinery concept). Moreover, the promotion of agricultural residues-based business is discussed through industrial ecology, to promote synergy, on a local basis, between different agricultural and industrial value chains. Finally, to facilitate a holistic approach and optimise materials and knowledge flows management, the connection of stakeholders is discussed to promote cross-sectorial collaboration and resource exchange at appropriate geographic scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klüppel, H.-J. (2005) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2005.03.001 · Cited by 4,639
Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass
Hendriks, A. T. W. M., & Zeeman, G. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027 · Cited by 3,794
Werpy, T., & Petersen, G. (2004) · doi:10.2172/15008859 · Cited by 3,201
Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144 · Cited by 2,062
Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art
Sheldon, R. A. (2014) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c3gc41935e · Cited by 1,678
Steinmetz, Z., Wollmann, C., Schaefer, M., Buchmann, C., David, J., Tröger, J., Muñoz, K., Frör, O., & Schaumann, G. E. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153 · Cited by 1,551
Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives
Angelidaki, I., Treu, L., Tsapekos, P., Luo, G., Campanaro, S., Wenzel, H., & Kougias, P. G. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011 · Cited by 1,426
Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production
Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2014) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001 · Cited by 1,343
Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review
Möller, K., & Müller, T. (2012) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201100085 · Cited by 1,339
Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication
EconomyResources, U. E. I. G., & BranchText, M. (2017) · Cited by 1,330
Cited by
Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review
van Huis, A. (2020) · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed · doi:10.3920/jiff2019.0017 · Cited by 544
Production of Sustainable and Biodegradable Polymers from Agricultural Waste
Maraveas, C. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12051127 · Cited by 423
Gaur, V. K., Sharma, P., Sirohi, R., Awasthi, M. K., Dussap, C.-G., & Pandey, A. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123019 · Cited by 268
Agricultural waste biorefinery development towards circular bioeconomy
Awasthi, M. K., Sindhu, R., Sirohi, R., Kumar, V., Ahluwalia, V., Binod, P., Juneja, A., Kumar, D., Yan, B., Sarsaiya, S., et al. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112122 · Cited by 259
Castillo, M., de Guzman, M. J. K., & Aberilla, J. M. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.012 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Gontard, N., Sonesson, U., Birkved, M., Majone, M., Bolzonella, D., Celli, A., Angellier-Coussy, H., Jang, G.-W., Verniquet, A., Broeze, J., Schaer, B., Batista, A. P., & Sebok, A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-19
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 614-654
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2888450815
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 58.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389.2018.1471957
- The paper
- Gontard, N., Sonesson, U., Birkved, M., Majone, M., Bolzonella, D., Celli, A., Angellier-Coussy, H., Jang, G.-W., Verniquet, A., Broeze, J., Schaer, B., Batista, A. P., & Sebok, A. (2018). A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1471957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
