The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphorus Retention in Streams and Wetlands: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Wetlands and streams buffer the interactions among uplands and adjacent aquatic systems. Phosphorus (P) is often the key nutrient found to be limiting in both estuarine and freshwater ecosystems. As such, the ability of wetlands and streams to retain P is key to determining downstream water quality. This article reviews the processes and factors regulating P retention in streams and wetlands and evaluates selected methodologies used to estimate P retention in these systems. Phosphorus retention mechanisms reviewed include uptake and release by vegetation, periphyton and microorganisms; sorption and exchange reactions with soils and sediments; chemical precipitation in the water column; and sedimentation and entrainment. These mechanisms exemplify the combined biological, physical, and chemical nature of P retention in wetlands and streams. Methodologies used to estimate P retention include empirical input-output analysis and mass balances, and process kinetics applied at various scales, including micro- and mesocosms to full-scale systems. Although complex numerical models are available to estimate P retention and transport, a simple understanding of P retention at the process level is important, but the overall picture provided by mass balance and kinetic evaluations are often more useful in estimating long-term P retention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands
Vymazal, J. (2007) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014 · Cited by 2,762
Chanasyk, D. S., Whitson, I. R., Mapfumo, E., Burke, J. M., & Prepas, E. E. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science · doi:10.1139/s03-034 · Cited by 51
Uncharted waters: the rise of human-made aquatic environments in the age of the “Anthropocene”
Saulnier-Talbot, É., & Lavoie, I. (2018) · Anthropocene · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2018.07.003 · Cited by 38
Alshehri, K., Harbottle, M., Sapsford, D., Beames, A., & Cleall, P. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137352 · Cited by 36
Chen, C., Wang, F., Hong, Y., Liu, R., & Luo, L. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47860-8 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, K. R., Kadlec, R. H., Flaig, E., & Gale, P. M.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-146
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2055071662
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Retention in Streams and Wetlands: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643389991259182
- The paper
- Reddy, K. R., Kadlec, R. H., Flaig, E., & Gale, P. M. (1999). Phosphorus Retention in Streams and Wetlands: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389991259182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.