Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Winnebagos, Cherokees, Apaches, and Dakotas: The Persistence of Stereotyping of American Indians in American Advertising Brands

Merskin, Debra·2001·Howard Journal of Communications

Abstract

Jeep Cherokee, Sue Bee Honey, and Crazy Horse Malt Liquor are all established brand names and trademarks that use representations of Native Americans to help sell their products. How stereotypes are created, and how pictorial metaphors used in advertising perpetuate these beliefs, is the focus of this study. McCracken's Meaning Transfer Model and Barthes's semiotic analysis serve as the framework of this study. The findings, which are important to scholars and practitioners, posit that these images build upon longstanding assumptions about Native Americans by Whites and reinforce an ideology that has resulted in a consumer "blind spot" when it comes to recognizing this form of racism. This study contributes to the scarce literature on representations of American Indians in modern media, providing a framework for understanding why these images persist and why they are problematic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/106461701753210439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Champagne D., 1994, Native America: Portrait of the peoples
  2. 10.1080/106461798246943 · DOI
  3. Metz S., 1994, Business and Society Review, 83, 30
  4. Mihesuah DL A., 1996, American Indians: Stereotypes and realities
  5. Morgan H., 1986, Symbols of America
  6. Schmitt R, 1997, Marketing aesthetics The strategic management of brands, identity, and image
  7. Specktor M., 1995, National Catholic Reporter, 31, 3
  8. Strickland, R. (1998). The celluloid Indian. Oregon Quarterly (Summer), 9-10.
  9. van DiJk T. A., 1996, Discourse, racism, and ideology
  10. Westerman M., 1989, American Demographics, 11, 28
  11. Williamson J., 1978, Decoding advertisements: Ideology and meaning in advertising
  12. Cortese A. J., 1999, Provocateur: Images of women and minorities in advertising
  13. Aaker D., 1993, Advertising's role in building strong brands
  14. Barthes R., 1972, Mythologies
  15. Berkhofer R., 1979, The white man's Indian: Images of the American Indian from Columbus to the present
  16. Dolz W., 1996, What a character! 20th century American advertising icons
  17. Goings K. W., 1994, Mammy and Uncle Mose: Black collectibles and American stereotyping
  18. 10.1007/BF01666536 · DOI
  19. Hall S., 1997, Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices
  20. Kates S. M, 1999, Journal of Advertising, 28, 33, 10.1080/00913367.1999.10673582 · DOI
  21. Kern-Foxworth M, 1994, Auntjemima, Uncle Ben, and Rastus: Blacks in advertising yesterday, today, and tomorrow
  22. Larson C., 1937, Journalism Quarterly, 14, 333, 10.1177/107769903701400402 · DOI
  23. Lippmann W., 1922, Public opinion
  24. McCracken G., 1993, Brand Equity in advertising: Advertising's role in building strong brands
  25. Bird S. E., 1996, Dressing in feathers: The construction of the Indian in American popular culture, 245
  26. Blalock O., 1992, Beverage Industry, 83, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Merskin, D.
Venue
Howard Journal of Communications
Published
2001-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
159-169
ISSN
  • 1064-6175
  • 1096-4649
Cited by
39
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review