CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making Ends Meet: Bringing Bilingual Education and Mainstream Students Together in Preservice Teacher Education

Evans, Carol, Arnot-Hopffer, Elizabeth, Jurich, Donna·2005·Equity & Excellence in Education
DOI 10.1080/10665680590907855
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In some institutions offering certification for bilingual education and ESL teachers, the corresponding mainstream programs do little to ready their students to work effectively with language minority children. Yet today's mainstream classrooms are linguistically and culturally diverse, and all teachers must appreciate the role of language and culture in teaching and learning. This study describes one effort to consciously combine preservice bilingual and mainstream education teachers in a bilingual education methods cohort. Students reported promising gains in cross-cultural understanding and in cross-program appreciation. Some losses took place as well, however, and further innovation and research are needed in order to ensure that such efforts to combine programs strengthen, but not weaken, each program.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10665680590907855

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Collier V. P., 1995, Providing academic success for ESL students
  2. Delpit L. D., 1995, Other peoples' children: Cultural conflict in the classroom
  3. Flores Dueñas L., 2004, Multicultural and multilingual literacy and language practices: Contexts and practices, 180
  4. Menken K., 2000, Framing effective practice: Topics and issues in educating English language learners, 41
  5. Morey A. I., 1997, Multicultural course transformation in higher education: A broader truth
  6. 2003, NABE News, 26, 52
  7. Reyes M., 2001, The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students
  8. Reyes P., 1999, Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities
  9. Schinke-Llano L., 1983, Classroom-centered research in second language acquisition, 146
  10. Skyrtic T., 1991, Effective schools for all, 20
  11. Sleeter C. E., 1986, Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 6, 105
  12. Wong-Fillmore L., 2000, What elementary teachers need to know about language

Cited by

See all 36

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Evans, C., Arnot-Hopffer, E., & Jurich, D.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Equity & Excellence in Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-02-16
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
75-88
ISSN
  • 1066-5684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3457
DOI
10.1080/10665680590907855
OpenAlex
W2058187875
Cited by
36
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Equity & Excellence in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
bilingual education, mainstream education, initial teacher education, teacher preparation, language minority students, intercultural understanding, multicultural classrooms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review