The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Capital and Academic Motivation Among First-Generation Community College Students
Abstract
Social capital, the value of a relationship that provides support and assistance in a given social situation (Stanton-Salazar, 2001), is a useful theory for understanding the experiences of low-income adolescents who are the first in their families to attend college. According to social capital theory, networks of relationships can help students manage an unfamiliar environment by providing them with relevant information, guidance, and emotional support. Existing research on social capital in postsecondary institutions has focused on low-income, ethnic minority adolescents, finding that low socioeconomic status (low-SES) and first-generation ethnic minority students struggle in accessing beneficial social capital on campus (Prospero & Vohra-Gupta, 2007; Saunders & Serna, 2004). However, the academic and social adjustment of first-generation, low-income White students is an understudied phenomenon. Therefore, this study examined how White, working-class, first-generation community college students, enrolled at a community college in northern Nevada, managed to integrate themselves, both socially and academically, into college. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze the interview data (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). Overall, first-generation, working-class, White community college students face many obstacles to earning postsecondary degrees, and social capital in the form of relationships with institutional agents on campus may be able to help them further their academic goals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“educational researchers tend to focus on barriers encountered by FGC students, rather than on what contributes to their success (Garrison & Gardner, 2012;Moschetti & Hudley, 2015).”
From Understanding first-generation undergraduate engineering students’ entry and persistence through social capital theory (2020) · cites this paper as Moschetti & Hudley, 2015
In the citing paper
“Family support appears not only as tangible actions, such as providing financial help (Holland, 2010), but also as intangible aspects like emotional support (Holland, 2010;Moschetti & Hudley, 2015).”
From Understanding first-generation undergraduate engineering students’ entry and persistence through social capital theory (2020) · cites this paper as Moschetti & Hudley, 2015
Citations
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,637
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. J. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.)
Sharp, C. (2003) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x0300300213 · Cited by 14,982
Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 14,887
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136
(1990) · Cited by 8,425
Handbook of qualitative research
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0057 · Cited by 7,081
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Brodsky, C. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71872-7 · Cited by 6,728
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Choy, S. P. (2001). Findings from the Condition of Education 2001: Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES 2001–136). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012– 045). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
- Nuñez, A., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (NCES 98-082). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
Silver, B. R., & McCarron, G. P. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009408240.015
Salazar, A. L., Kalamkarian, H. S., & Herman, M. L. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009408240.019
Food for Thought: Understanding Food and Housing Insecurity Among MOC at Community Colleges
Reid, M., Yu, H., & Bohlig, E. M. (2025) · Community College Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/10668926.2025.2527903
Amoakoh, M. N. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5364152
Tannous-Haddad, L., & Hadar, E. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05808-6
Nkansah, J. O., Fan, Y., Khan, A. W., Agyemang-Duah, W., & Sharif, M. M. (2025) · International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance · doi:10.1007/s10775-025-09761-3
Mechanisms of STEM Retention: Lessons from Interview Data from Students in STEM Cohort Program
Kursav, M. N., Sweeder, R. D., & Valles, S. A. (2025) · Journal of STEM Education Innovations and Research · doi:10.63504/jstem.v26i3.2618
Camo-Biogradlija, J., Brockman, S. L., Ratledge, A., & O’Donoghue, R. (2026) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/00420859251405235
Huesmann, M. (2026) · Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal · doi:10.1108/edi-03-2025-0188
Sherif, V., Patterson, J. A., & Redger-Marquardt, C. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-897-520251010
Caleon, I. S., & Kheng, C. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2026.2708733
Geremew, Y. M., & Kleynhans, C. I. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education · doi:10.1080/10963758.2026.2720944
Metadata
- Authors
- Moschetti, R. V., & Hudley, C.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moschetti, Roxanne Venus
- Venue
- Community College Journal of Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-08-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-251
- ISSN
- 1066-8926 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0413
- OpenAlex
- W2045807005
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Community College Journal of Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Keywords
- social capital, first-generation college students, community college students, academic motivation, working-class students, social integration, academic adjustment, institutional relations, social networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review