Cited by 2Higher Education Research StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The Surprising Labor Market Success of Part-Time Community College Students

Maggio, Christopher, Attewell, Paul·2020·Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Abstract

Considerable research has focused on the academic outcomes of part-time undergraduates, but few studies have addressed their post-college labor market outcomes. This study compares the post-college earnings of community college students based on different full-time, part-time, and stop-out trajectories during their first four semesters. Community college students who enroll part-time with no stop-outs during their first four semesters earn significantly more after college than full-timers. Part-timers who did stop out are earning at least as much as their full-time counterparts. These effects are evident both among those who graduate/earn 60 credits and among those who do not. Compared to consistent full-time enrollees, two groups of community college undergraduates have significantly lower post-college earnings in the full sample: full-timers who interrupt their studies with a stop-out and persons who mix full-time with part-time and stopping-out.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10668926.2019.1616634

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://static.ark.org/eeuploads/lt-gov/Toolbox_Revisited_Tbl_5.pdf
  2. Aina, C., & Pastore, F. (2012). Delayed graduation and overeducation: A test of the human capital model versus the screening hypothesis. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp6413.pdf
  3. 10.3102/0162373711421958 · DOI
  4. Attewell, P., & Jang, S. H. (2013). Summer coursework and completing college. Research in Higher Education Journal, 20, 1.
  5. 10.1007/s11162-015-9401-z · DOI
  6. Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2017). Even one semester: Full-time enrollment and student success. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, College of Education, Department of Educational Administration, Program in Higher Education Leadership.
  7. 10.1086/677959 · DOI
  8. EAB. (2018). Reframing the question of equity: Understanding the growing importance of success for community colleges’ part-time students. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.eab.com/-/media/EAB/Technology/Student-Success-Navigate/36143-AACC-Whitepaper.pdf
  9. 10.7591/9781501727184 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.04.001 · DOI
  11. 10.3386/w18121 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11162-010-9176-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0091552115576565 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/00221546.2009.11779014 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/00221546.2016.1243948 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.09.003 · DOI
  17. Nora, A. (2002). A theoretical and practical view of student adjustment and academic achievement. In W. G. Tierney & L. S. Hagedorn (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 65–77). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  18. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. 10.1007/BF00973717 · DOI
  20. 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.06 · DOI
  21. Titus, M. A. (2010). Understanding the relationship between working while in college and future salaries. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Understanding the working college student: New research and its implications for policy and practice (pp. 261–282). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Metadata

Authors
Maggio, C., & Attewell, P.
Affiliations
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
Maggio, Christopher
Venue
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Published
2019-05-27
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
528-543
ISSN
  • 1066-8926 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0413
OpenAlex
W2947860529
Cited by
2
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Community College Journal of Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ascendium Education Group (7E100-00 01)
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (7E091-00 01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
part-time admission, community college students, graduate earnings, labor market outcomes, full-time enrollment, college completion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review