Cited by 25Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Profession-based manual therapy nomenclature: exploring history, limitations, and opportunities

Open access
Degenhardt, Brian, van Dun, Patrick L.S., Jacobson, Eric, Fritz, Sandy, Mettler, Paul, Kettner, Norman, Kelley-Franklin, Gwyn, Hensel, Kendi +9 more·2024·Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The International Consortium on Manual Therapies (ICMT) is a grassroots interprofessional association open to any formally trained practitioner of manual therapy (MT) and basic scientists promoting research related to the practice of MT. Currently, MT research is impeded by professions' lack of communication with other MT professions, biases, and vernacular. Current ICMT goals are to minimize these barriers, compare MT techniques, and establish an interprofessional MT glossary. METHODS: Practitioners from all professions with training in manual therapies were encouraged by e-mail and website to participate (www.ICMTConferene.org). Video conferences were conducted at least bimonthly for 2.5 years by profession-specific and interprofessional focus groups (FGs). Members summarized scopes of practice, technique descriptions, associated mechanisms of action (MOA), and glossary terms. Each profession presented their work to the interprofessional FG to promote dialogue, understanding and consensus. Outcomes were reported and refined at numerous public events. RESULTS: Focus groups with representatives from 5 MT professions, chiropractic, massage therapy, osteopathic, physical therapy and structural integration identified 17 targeting osseous structures and 49 targeting nonosseous structures. Thirty-two techniques appeared distinct to a specific profession, and 13 were used by more than 1. Comparing descriptions identified additional commonalities. All professions agreed on 4 MOA categories for MT. A glossary of 280 terms and definitions was consolidated, representing key concepts in MT. Twenty-one terms were used by all MT professions and basic scientists. Five terms were used by MT professions exclusive of basic scientists. CONCLUSION: Outcomes suggested a third to a half of techniques used in MT are similar across professions. Additional research is needed to better define the extent of similarity and how to consistently identify those approaches. Ongoing expansion and refinement of the glossary is necessary to promote descriptive clarity and facilitate communication between practitioners and basic scientists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10669817.2023.2288495

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual therapy may be administered by different professionals, including physiotherapists, osteopaths, chiropractors, dental specialists and medical doctors.

    “Manual therapy may be administered by different professionals, including physiotherapists, osteopaths, chiropractors, dental specialists and medical doctors from various specializations [14].”

    From Efficacy of manual therapy by different healthcare professionals on pain and function in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results’ scope-of-practice table identifies physiotherapists, chiropractors and osteopathic practitioners as manual-therapy providers, and describes osteopathic physicians as licensed to practise medicine and use osteopathic manipulative medicine. It does not identify dental specialists or medical doctors from other specializations as providers. The available passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Variability in outcomes may reflect the therapist's level of training, precision and clinical competence.

    “Variability in outcomes may reflect the therapist’s level of training, precision and clinical competence [13,14].”

    From Efficacy of manual therapy by different healthcare professionals on pain and function in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion’s recommendations say that standardized technique parameters could help educational programs advance practitioners’ training and skills. They do not address whether differences in therapist training, precision, or clinical competence explain variability in patient outcomes; searches for those terms found no passage making that connection. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The success of manual therapy interventions may be contingent on the practitioner's qualifications and experience.

    “The success of manual therapy interventions may therefore be contingent on the practitioner’s qualifications and experience [13,14].”

    From Efficacy of manual therapy by different healthcare professionals on pain and function in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction and Discussion passages address differences among manual-therapy professions, training, and techniques, but do not link intervention success to an individual practitioner’s qualifications or experience. Searches for practitioner experience, skill, and treatment outcomes found no passage making that connection. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Houdeleck J, De Mare J. L’historique des manipulations. In: Hérisson C, and Vautravers P, editors Les Manipulations Vertébrales: Collection de Pathologie Locomotrice 29. Paris, Franc: Elsevier Masson; 1994. p. 1.
  2. [2]Ottoson A. Wurde die Geschichte der Manipulation von Wirbelsäule und Gelenken manipuliert? Manuelletherapie. 2012; 16(4): 192– 196. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327032 · DOI
  3. [3]Gevitz N. The DOs: osteopathic Medicine in America. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2019.
  4. [4]Leach RA. Doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome: it is time for a questioning philosophy and theory-driven chiropractic research. J Chiropr Humanit. 2019; 26: 60– 74. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2019.08.002 31871438 PMC6911892 · DOI
  5. [7]Hulett GD A text book of the principles of osteopathy. 4th ed. Journal Printing Co; 1906. Available from: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/hpszjce9
  6. [12]Palmer DD The Chiropractor. Press of Beacon Light, Los Angeles, CA; 1914. Available from: https://welcomecollection.org/works/vhdfhv6c
  7. [13]Graham D. Massage, manual treatment, remedial movements, history, modes of application, and effects: indications and contra-indications. J.P. Lippincott Company; 1913. Available from: https://welcomecollection.org/works/y5j3fxz8
  8. [18]National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Neurocircuitry of force-based manipulations workshop. Published September 2019. [ cited 2023 June 23]. Available from: https://files.nccih.nih.gov/force-workshop-summary-110920-508-updated.pdf.
  9. [19]Standley PR. My personal journey that led to the crossroads of interdisciplinary manual medicine research: serendipitous opportunities afforded a basic scientist. J Osteopath Med. 2013; 113(2): 179– 183. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.113.2.179 23294687 · DOI
  10. [21]Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012; 18(2): 188– 194. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02017.x 22435983 · DOI
  11. [22]Olsen J. The nominal group technique (NGT) as a tool for facilitating pan-disability focus groups and as a new method for quantifying changes in qualitative data. Int J Qual Methods. 2019; 18: 18. doi: 10.1177/1609406919866049 · DOI
  12. [23]Vande Ven AH, Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health. 1972; 62(3): 337– 342. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.337 5011164 PMC1530096 · DOI
  13. [24]International Consortium on Manual Therapies. Conference. 2022. [ cited 2023 June 21]. Available from: https://www.icmtconference.org/international-congress-on-manual-therapies/.
  14. [25]Glossary. In: Himelfarb I, Hayland JK, Ouzts NE, editors. Practice Analysis of Chiropractic 2020. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2020. pp. 134– 154
  15. [26]Harrison DD, Siskin LA. eds. Best practices and practice guidelines. Falls Church, VA: International Chiropractors Association; 2009. pp. 271– 282.
  16. [28]Glossary. In: Rushton A, Beeton K, Jordaan R, editors. Education standards in orthopaedic manipulative therapy. Part A: educational standards 2016. Albany, Aukland: International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists; Vol. 2016. pp. 26– 36
  17. [29]Pincus T, Foster NE, Vogel S, et al. Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp. Man Ther. 2007; 12(2): 167– 175. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.005 16914363 · DOI
  18. [30]van de Veen EA, de Vet HC, Pool JJ, et al. Variance in manual treatment of nonspecific low back pain between orthomanual physicians, manual therapists, and chiropractors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005; 28(2): 108– 116. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.01.008 15800510 · DOI
  19. [31]Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Gross AR, et al. Treatment preferences amongst physical therapists and chiropractors for the management of neck pain: results of an international survey. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 24; 22(1): 11. PMID: 24661461; PMCID: PMC3987839. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-22-11. PMC3987839 24661461 · DOI
  20. [32]Harvey E, Burton AK, Moffett JK, et al. UK BEAM trial team. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed to by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations. Man Ther. 2003; 8(1): 46– 51. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0472 12635637 · DOI
  21. [33]Kumka M, Bonar J. Fascia: a morphological description and classification system based on a literature review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012; 56(3): 179– 191. doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0757-7 22997468 PMC3430451 · DOI
  22. [34]Mintken PE, DeRosa C, Little T, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic manual physical therapists. AAOMPT clinical guidelines: a model for standardizing manipulation terminology in physical therapy practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38(3): A1– A6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0301 18349498 · DOI
  23. [36]Evans DW, Lucas N. What is ‘manipulation’? A reappraisal. Man Ther. 2010; 15(3): 286– 291. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.009 20080431 · DOI
  24. [37]Evans DW, Lucas N. What is manipulation? A new definition. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1): 194. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06298-w 36918833 PMC10015914 · DOI
  25. [38]Thomas E, Bianco A, Paoli A, et al. The relation between stretching typology and stretching duration: the effects on range of motion. Int J Sports Med. 2018; 39(4): 243– 254. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-101146 29506306 · DOI
  26. [40]Ptaszkowski K, Slupska L, Paprocka-Borowicz M, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes after postisometric muscle relaxation or kinesio taping application for normalization of the upper trapezius muscle tone and the pain relief: a preliminary study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015; 2015: 721938. doi: 10.1155/2015/721938 26347792 PMC4549535 · DOI
  27. [41]Esteves JE, Cerritelli F, Kim J, et al. Osteopathic care as (En)active inference: a theoretical framework for developing an integrative hypothesis in osteopathy. Frontiers In Psychology. 2022; 13: 812926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812926 35250743 PMC8894811 · DOI
  28. [43]Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28(2): 431– 438. 11246692
  29. [44]Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005; 113(1–2): 9– 19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 15621359 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [45]Nabhan M, Elraiyah T, Brown DR, et al. What is preventable harm in healthcare? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 128. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-128 22630817 PMC3405467 · DOI
  31. [46]Woolf S, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci. 2012; 7(1): 61. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-61 22762158 PMC3436711 · DOI
  32. [47]Leysen P, Bombeke K, Remmen R. Osteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: an illustration of osteopathic semantic confusion. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013; 113(9): 660– 661. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.030 24005084 · DOI
  33. [48]de Vet HC, Heymans MW, Dunn KM, et al. Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(21): 2409– 2416. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00016 12438991 · DOI
  34. [49]Stanton TR, Latimer J, Maher CG, et al. How do we define the condition ‘recurrent low back pain’? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(4): 533– 539. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1214-3 19921522 PMC2899839 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degenhardt, B., van Dun, P. L. S., Jacobson, E., Fritz, S., Mettler, P., Kettner, N., Kelley-Franklin, G., Hensel, K., Lesondak, D., Consorti, G., Frank, L., Reed, W. R., MacDonald, C., Kremen, V., Martin, C., Landels, B., & Standley, P.
Affiliations
  • A.T. Still Research Institute (US)
  • Foundation COME Collaboration
  • Harvard University (US)
  • School of Therapeutic Massage
  • and Mettler Institute
  • Logan University (US)
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Praxis für Orthopädie, Osteopathie und Sportmedizin
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Regis University (US)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague
  • Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences (US)
  • Anatomy Trains
  • University of Arizona College of Medicine- Phoenix (US)
Corresponding author
Degenhardt, Brian
Venue
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Published
2023-12-17
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
96-110
ISSN
  • 1066-9817 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6186
OpenAlex
W4389870028
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Osteopathic Heritage Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
manual therapy, nomenclature, glossary, interprofessional communication, chiropractic, massage, osteopathic manipulative treatment, physiotherapy, structural integration, mechanism of action, scope of practice, terminology standardization
MeSH terms
Chiropractic, Humans, Osteopathic Medicine, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Physical Therapy Modalities, Osteopathic Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review