The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategically Leveraging Learning Space to Create Partnership Opportunities
Abstract
The Management & Economics Library at Purdue University began a major physical and conceptual renovation four years ago. The conceptual renovation involves a rethinking of library faculty and staff roles and responsibilities based on the library's and university's strategic directives. The LearnLab space is being used as a springboard to create new partnerships, to implement our new roles, and to transform the perspective of an academic library's present capability. This article will highlight the variety of opportunities that have arisen by leveraging the LearnLab space.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34085991 · Cited by 1,810
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Bearce J., 2010, Wall Street Journal, 23, C1
- Lippincott J. K., 2009, EDUCAUSE Review, 44, 16
- 10.1108/00907320710774274 · DOI
- Beagle D., 2006, The information commons handbook
- 10.1080/13614530802518941 · DOI
- Cook D., 2000, The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe, 19
- 10.1080/01930820802035059 · DOI
- 10.1080/08963560802424011 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075070902771903 · DOI
- Hunley S., 2006, Learning Spaces
- 10.1300/J109v11n04_02 · DOI
- Lippincott J. K., 2006, Learning spaces, 7.1
- Oblinger D., 2005, EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28, 14
- Powell D., 2008, Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design: Proceedings of the Next Generation Learning Spaces 2008 Colloquium, 25
- Radcliffe D., 2008, Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design: Proceedings of the Next Generation Learning Spaces 2008 Colloquium, 9
- 10.1080/13614530701330380 · DOI
- 10.1080/14748460802489355 · DOI
- Stuart C., 2009, Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 264, 7, 10.29242/rli.264.3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Connector, Catalyst and Common Good: Defining the Academic Library of the 21st Century
Jaguszewski, J., & McGuire, L. A. (2018) · Library Leadership & Management · doi:10.5860/llm.v32i2.7227 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Doan, T., & Kirkwood, H.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Kirkwood, Hal
- Venue
- College & Undergraduate Libraries
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 239-248
- ISSN
- 1069-1316 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2530
- OpenAlex
- W2168543847
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- College & Undergraduate Libraries (publishedVersion)
- Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- academic libraries, library renovation, learning spaces, library partnerships, library strategic planning, Purdue University, library space utilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
