The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causation issues in structural equation modeling research
Open accessAbstract
As the use of structural equation modeling (SEM) has increased, confusion has grown concerning the correct use of and the conclusions that can be legitimately drawn from these methodologies. It appears that much of the controversy surrounding SEM is related to the degree of certainty with which causal statements can be drawn from these procedures. SEM is discussed in relation to the conditions necessary for providing causal evidence. Both the weaknesses and the strengths of SEM are examined. Although structural modeling cannot ensure that necessary causal conditions have been met, it is argued that SEM methods may offer the potential for tentative causal inferences to be drawn when used with carefully specified and controlled designs. Keeping in mind that no statistical methodology can in and of itself determine causality, specific guidelines are suggested to help researchers approach a potential for providing causal evidence with SEM procedures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A cross-sectional sampling approach was also used in this paper. As a result, while possible causal effects between the study latent factors can be inferred cautiously, they cannot be identified with certainty, therefore, a longitudinal research design will be advantageous in confirming the study's possible causal relationships [82].”
From The Impact of Religiosity and Food Consumption Culture on Food Waste Intention in Saudi Arabia (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cites
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Review of personality and social psychology
Davies, M. (1983) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(83)90072-7 · Cited by 3,394
Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. A. (1989) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4 · Cited by 1,688
Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal Modeling
Bentler, P. M. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223 · Cited by 1,621
Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data
Schriesheim, C. A., James, L. R., Muliak, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258244 · Cited by 1,240
A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.2.239 · Cited by 1,235
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1289 · DOI
- 10.1080/08098130809478203 · DOI
- 10.3102/10769986012002206 · DOI
- Games , P. A. 1988 . Invited commentary: “Correlation and causation: An alternative view.” . The Score , XI April : 9 – 10 .
- 10.3102/0013189X015009012 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.180 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.604 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.598 · DOI
- 10.2307/1130289 · DOI
- Mulaik , S. A. . A conception of causality for structural modeling . Paper presented at the Symposium on Methodological Issues in Causal Modeling . March , Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama .
- 10.2307/1130288 · DOI
- Mulaik , S. A. . An analysis of the conditions under which the estimation of parameters inflate goodness of fit indices as measures of model validity . Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society . Princeton, NJ. June ,
- 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.371 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–236 of 236
Baum, M. (2026) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.70029 · Cited by 1
Decoupling from place? Telework and firm relocation in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area
Colaço, R., & Silva, J. D. A. E. (2026) · Regional Science Policy & Practice · doi:10.1016/j.rspp.2026.100294 · Cited by 1
Jagannathan, L. (2008) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1177/097324700800400407 · Cited by 1
The Qualitative Other: An Autoethnography
Jørgensen, M. T. (2018) · Perspectives on Asian tourism · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_9 · Cited by 1
Product Design as a Critical Success Factor in TQM Organizations
Jagannathan, L. (2008) · International Journal of Business · Cited by 1
Macklin, J., Smith, L. D. G., & Curtis, J. (2025) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2024.12.004 · Cited by 2
Causal Inference: Foundations for Health Care Managerial Decision-Making
Wan, T. T. H. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0795-6_2 · Cited by 1
Alhosani, M. S. A. I., & Yaakub, K. B. (2021) · European Journal of Economics and Business Studies · doi:10.26417/540lll82 · Cited by 1
Corporate social responsibility and SMEs
(2007) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00472.x · Cited by 1
Sumantri, Y. (2012) · Research Online (University of Wollongong) · Cited by 1
Dickover, R. D. (2009) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 1
Growth Curve Analysis of the Situational Temptations Scale in a College Sample
Scott, A. (2015) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/thesis-scott-allie-2015 · Cited by 1
Alston, O. (2005) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Bruning, E. (2010) · Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives · doi:10.3917/risa.761.0093
Elshaer, I. A., & Elsawi, O. (2016) · Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality · doi:10.21608/jaauth.2016.49971
Ogollah, R. O. (2010) · Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Timková, V. (2020) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.136425533
Alhosani, M. S. A. I., & Yaakub, K. B. (2021) · European Journal of Economics and Business Studies · doi:10.26417/513ccm78l
van Osch, L. (2009) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20090515lo
Wan, T. T. H. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47557-x_4
Châu, T. L. D., Nguyễn, M. C., Nguyễn, T. L., & Đặng, T. N. (2023) · Can Tho University Journal of Science · doi:10.22144/ctujos.2023.202
Maximum Likelihood Estimation Approach using the CB-SEM Method: Case Study of Service Quality
Oktavia, P., Setiawan, E., Nusyirwan, N., & Herawati, N. (2023) · Sciencestatistics: Journal of Statistics, Probability, and Its Application · doi:10.24127/sciencestatistics.v1i2.5031
Child’s Illness and Social Support for Parents: An Empirical Analysis in an Eastern European Context
Czaderny, K., & Soosalu, J. (2025) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-025-03176-y
Employee Engagement in the City of Ekurhuleni Disaster and Emergency Management Services
Koch, H. W., Ndevu, Z., & Kidd, M. (2025) · Administratio publica. · doi:10.61967/adminpub.2025.33.3.3 · Cited by 1
Les déterminants du succès entrepreneurial; Une étude empirique de la région de Sfax en TunisiePreprint
Zaied, Y. B., & Siagh, A. R. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Macklin, J., Smith, L. D. G., & Curtis, J. M. (2023) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/kyvea
Grossbauer, L. A., Bodzin, A. M., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2026) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2026.2639918
Curtis, J. M., Smith, L., & Macklin, J. (2026) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Łukasik, A., & Łaba-Hornecka, A. (2026) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/14747049261473640
Impact analysis of institutional framework and policy preferences with Bayesian structural equation
Jin, S., Chang, L., Zhang, N., & Li, Y. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0358701
Metadata
- Authors
- Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L., & Mulaik, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Harlow, Lisa L.
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-267
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2000776953
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, causality, causal inference, causal evidence, research design, methodological limitations, research guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review