The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Media and Social Networking Sites: The Politics of Individuation and Political Participation
Abstract
The rapid growth in usage of social networking sites begs a reconsideration of the meaning of mediated political participation in society. Castells (2009 Castells, M. 2009. Communication power, Oxford, , England: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]) contended that social networking sites offer a form of mass communication of the self wherein individuals can acquire a new creative autonomy. Stiegler (2009 Stiegler, B. 2009. Teleologics of the snail: The errant self wired to a WiMax network. Theory, Culture and Society, 26(2–3): 33–45. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the Ars Industrialis collective believe that the processes of individuation, and of speaking out, hold the key to empowerment, agency, and resistance. In this article the authors offer a critical reflection on the logic of mediated participation promoted by social media through a consideration of the differences between individual and collective forms of mediated political participation. Drawing on ethnographic research on alternative media within the Trade Union Movement in Britain and recent research on the political culture of social networking sites, the authors argue that far from being empowering, the logic of self-centered participation promoted by social media can represent a threat for political groups rather than an opportunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6933 · Cited by 3,367
Social Movements: An Introduction
So, A. Y., Porta, D. D., & Diani, M. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2653970 · Cited by 3,160
Castells, M. (2009) · Cited by 2,619
Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-0366 · Cited by 2,411
Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1205 · Cited by 2,323
Ethnography through Thick and Thin
Marcus, G. E. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400851805 · Cited by 2,094
Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age
Melucci, A. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520891 · Cited by 1,976
Terranova, T. (2000) · Social Text · doi:10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33 · Cited by 1,749
Hindman, M. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837496 · Cited by 1,680
Cited by
Sadler, O. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221094769 · Cited by 40
“Authors have also critically examined this turn toward individualistic activism, specifically focusing on its potential threats to democracy and activist movements (Andrejevic, 2005; Fenton & Barassi, 2011; Hindman, 2009; Sandoval & Fuchs, 2009).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenton, N., & Barassi, V.
- Venue
- The Communication Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-196
- ISSN
- 1071-4421 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7487
- OpenAlex
- W2058429273
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 38.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Media and Social Networking Sites: The Politics of Individuation and Political Participation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10714421.2011.597245
- The paper
- Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative Media and Social Networking Sites: The Politics of Individuation and Political Participation. The Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.