Cited by 21Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender, Feminism, and MediaImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Towards ‘romantic media ideologies’: digital dating abuse seen through the lens of social media and/or dating in teenage narratives

Belotti, Francesca, Ieracitano, Francesca, Donato, Stellamarina, Comunello, Francesca·2022·The Communication Review

Abstract

The article addresses the teenagers’ perception of those forms of teen dating violence that occur on digital media (i.e., ‘digital dating abuse,’ DDA), such as snooping around, controlling behaviors, and aggravated sexting. It contributes to the strand of studies on DDA and those on the mutual shaping relationship between technology and society by focusing on the interplay between social media usage practices and dating practices among teenagers narrating DDA. We carried out 7 focus groups in Rome with 43 high school students aged 14–16 years, in order to explore whether and how the negotiation with social media platforms and the interaction between dating partners affect the adolescents’ perception of DDA. The thematic analysis reveals that participants refer to idioms of practice informed by media ideologies when seeing DDA as an issue related to social media, or to dating scripts supported by romantic ideologies when seeing it as an issue related to dating. They oscillate between these two interpretative ‘lenses,’ thus intertwining the platform social usage norms and broader societal beliefs surrounding dating relationships. In doing so, they give rise to ‘digital dating scripts’ and ‘romantic media ideologies’ which nowadays rule their dating relationships in a very specific way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10714421.2022.2033576

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belotti, F., Ieracitano, F., Donato, S., & Comunello, F.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Corresponding author
Belotti, Francesca
Venue
The Communication Review
Published
2022-01-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
30-53
ISSN
  • 1071-4421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7487
OpenAlex
W4210560677
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Communication Review (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
adolescent dating violence, social media, adolescents, Romantic ideology, media ideology, sexting, eavesdropping, controlling behavior, technology and society, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review