The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PREVENTIVE ATTACKS AGAINST NUCLEAR PROGRAMS AND THE “SUCCESS” AT OSIRAQ
Abstract
Advocates of the preventive use of force against emerging nuclear, biological, or chemical programs often look to the allegedly successful 1981 Israeli airstrike against Iraqi nuclear facilities at Osiraq. According to the conventional wisdom, this attack may have prevented Iraq from going nuclear before Operation Desert Storm in 1991. This article assesses the claim that the 1981 attack substantially delayed Iraqi acquisition of nuclear weapons, both by revisiting older debates and by introducing new evidence from Iraqi scientists. The article casts doubt on the conclusion that the attack was successful for three reasons: (1) the reactor itself was not well equipped to generate plutonium for a nuclear weapon; (2) illegal plutonium production would likely have caused a cutoff in the supply of nuclear fuel and an end to weapons activities; and (3) the attack may have actually increased Saddam's commitment to acquiring weapons. These conclusions have implications for the Bush Doctrine, as the lack of success in 1981 casts doubt on the possible success of future attacks against nuclear programs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reiter (2005) revealed that the success rate for preventive strikes was significantly lower than the popular notion that they were successful.”
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Basit, A., Bano, S., & Mahar, I. A. (2026) · ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences · doi:10.63056/academia.5.3(s6).2026.2033
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiter, D.
- Corresponding author
- Reiter, Dan
- ORCID
- Reiter, Dan
- Venue
- The Nonproliferation Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 355-371
- ISSN
- 1073-6700 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-1766
- OpenAlex
- W2033521747
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Nonproliferation Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Nuclear Issues and Defense
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
- Keywords
- nuclear proliferation, Saddam Hussein, nuclear fuel supply, Bush Doctrine, Operation Desert Storm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.