The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Test of Standing Function
Abstract
The Functional Standing Test (FST) has been proposed and described as an evaluative tool to assess a person's ability to perform one-handed reaching tasks while standing. The test items, several of which are identical to those in the Jebson Test of Hand Function, require the manipulation of objects on a counter top and on simulated kitchen shelves while the person is standing. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of FST when it is administered to adolescents with spinal cord injuries who stand with braces, and to able-bodied young adults. Two testers administered the FST separately to three individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) below T-2 who stood with knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) and to 10 able-bodied people who stood unassisted. The order in which the testers operated was randomized and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC (2,1)) was used to analyze inter-rater reliability. Eighty percent of the subtests were found to be moderately to very reliable when applied to either group on the same day. Half of the test items were categorized as having the same level of inter-rater reliability between the two sample populations. A modified version of the test eliminating unreliable components could serve as a valuable and inexpensive means of evaluating the effectiveness of various therapies and technologies to provide or assist standing function. Validity and specificity of the test remain the focus of future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Epimysial and intramuscular electrodes have restored short-duration standing and stepping function to select individuals with paraplegia.
“Epimysial and intramuscular electrodes have restored short-duration standing and stepping function to select individuals with paraplegia (Scheiner et al 1994, Triolo et al 1995, 1996, 2001, Daly et al 2001, Guiraud et al 2006).”
From Selective stimulation of the human femoral nerve with a flat interface nerve electrode (2010) · cites this paper as Triolo et al 1995
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Triolo, R. J., Bevelheimer, T., Eisenhower, G., & Wormser, D.
- Affiliations
- Shriners Hospitals for Children - Philadelphia (US)
- Arcadia University (US)
- ORCID
- Triolo, Ronald J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-22
- ISSN
- 1079-0268 (ISSN-L)
- 2045-7723
- OpenAlex
- W2349248610
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shriners Hospitals for Children
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- inter-rater reliability, spinal cord injury, adolescents, knee-ankle-foot orthoses, hand function assessment, test validity, intraclass correlation coefficient
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Braces, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Neurologic Examination, Posture, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Spinal Cord Injuries, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Weight-Bearing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review