Cited by 23Spinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Test of Standing Function

Triolo, Ronald J., Bevelheimer, Tric, Eisenhower, Georgia, Wormser, Diane·1995·The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Abstract

The Functional Standing Test (FST) has been proposed and described as an evaluative tool to assess a person's ability to perform one-handed reaching tasks while standing. The test items, several of which are identical to those in the Jebson Test of Hand Function, require the manipulation of objects on a counter top and on simulated kitchen shelves while the person is standing. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of FST when it is administered to adolescents with spinal cord injuries who stand with braces, and to able-bodied young adults. Two testers administered the FST separately to three individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) below T-2 who stood with knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) and to 10 able-bodied people who stood unassisted. The order in which the testers operated was randomized and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC (2,1)) was used to analyze inter-rater reliability. Eighty percent of the subtests were found to be moderately to very reliable when applied to either group on the same day. Half of the test items were categorized as having the same level of inter-rater reliability between the two sample populations. A modified version of the test eliminating unreliable components could serve as a valuable and inexpensive means of evaluating the effectiveness of various therapies and technologies to provide or assist standing function. Validity and specificity of the test remain the focus of future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10790268.1995.11719375

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epimysial and intramuscular electrodes have restored short-duration standing and stepping function to select individuals with paraplegia.

    “Epimysial and intramuscular electrodes have restored short-duration standing and stepping function to select individuals with paraplegia (Scheiner et al 1994, Triolo et al 1995, 1996, 2001, Daly et al 2001, Guiraud et al 2006).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 23

Metadata

Authors
Triolo, R. J., Bevelheimer, T., Eisenhower, G., & Wormser, D.
Affiliations
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children - Philadelphia (US)
  • Arcadia University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
1995-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
14-22
ISSN
  • 1079-0268 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7723
OpenAlex
W2349248610
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
inter-rater reliability, spinal cord injury, adolescents, knee-ankle-foot orthoses, hand function assessment, test validity, intraclass correlation coefficient
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Braces, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Neurologic Examination, Posture, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Spinal Cord Injuries, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Weight-Bearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review