Cited by 96Spinal Cord Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

New Approach to Study the Contents and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: The SCIRehab Project

Open access
Whiteneck, Gale, Cassaway, Julie, Dijkers, Marcel, Jha, Amitabh·2009·The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Limited research evidence is available to show the effectiveness of the many specific interventions provided in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation; what is available typically focuses on effects of the full rehabilitation package but not specific therapy interventions, medical procedures, patient education, or counseling. Given the problems of conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rehabilitation, practice-based evidence (PBE) research has been suggested as an alternative methodology for identifying which rehabilitation interventions are associated most strongly with positive outcomes, after controlling for patient differences. Using the PBE research methodology, the SCIRehab project attempts to "open the black box" of acute SCI rehabilitation, provide detailed information on treatments delivered by all rehabilitation disciplines, and contribute to outcomes-based guidelines for clinical decision-making. METHODS: The SCIRehab project includes 1,500 patients with acute SCI, consecutively admitted to 1 of 6 US inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Details of the rehabilitation process are captured by clinicians from multiple disciplines documenting their interventions in handheld personal digital assistants after sessions with their patients. Outcome data are abstracted from medical records (clinical outcomes data) and obtained from patient interviews at 6 and 12 months after injury. Extensive patient, injury, and other treatment characteristics are abstracted from medical records. SCIRehab is the first research project to collect detailed information on individual interventions offered by the full rehabilitation team. RESULTS: SCIRehab is the first research project to collect detailed information on individual interventions offered by the full rehabilitation team. These findings are presented in a series of 9 articles. CONCLUSIONS: To date, SCIRehab's major contribution is a system for categorizing specific contributions of each discipline and a technology for documenting that detail. After data collection is complete, future manuscripts will relate those process elements to outcomes. The SCIRehab Project is an important step toward establishing outcomes-based guidelines for SCI rehabilitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10790268.2009.11760779

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with cervical SCI typically have more complications, a longer hospital stay and substantial multidisciplinary treatments.

    “Individuals with cervical SCI typically have more complications, a longer hospital stay and substantial multidisciplinary treatments [30,32].”

    From Association of mindfulness to resilience, anxiety, and depressive symptoms after spinal cord injury-a correlational study (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Effectiveness of SCI Rehabilitation section says SCI often affects multiple body systems, requires lengthy rehabilitation, and involves multidisciplinary care. It does not say that people with cervical SCI typically have more complications or longer hospital stays than people with other SCI levels; its discussion of length of stay concerns rehabilitation generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The higher mindfulness in traumatic SCI may be due to extensive rehabilitation therapy regimens associated with survival of traumatic SCI, which may include fostering self-awareness and reflection.

    “This may be due to the extensive rehabilitation therapy regimens associated with survival of traumatic SCI, which may include fostering self-awareness and reflection Significant, p < 0.05.[30].”

    From Association of mindfulness to resilience, anxiety, and depressive symptoms after spinal cord injury-a correlational study (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The “Effectiveness of SCI Rehabilitation” section says that SCI can require a lengthy rehabilitation program to develop remaining abilities and support adjustment to a changed life. It does not say that rehabilitation fosters self-awareness or reflection, or link rehabilitation to higher mindfulness in people with traumatic SCI. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 96

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [10]10. Johnson K, Bailey J, Rundquist J, et al. SCIRehab Project Series: the supplemental nursing taxonomy. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(3):329-335.
  2. [28]28. Pagliacci MC, Celani MG, Zampolini M, et al. An Italian survey of traumatic spinal cord injury. The Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(9):1266-1275.
  3. [48]48. New P. Functional outcomes and disability after non- traumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: results from a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2): 250-261.
  4. [73]73. DeJong G, Horn S, Gassaway J, Stam HJ. Practice-based evidence for post-acute policy and practice: the case of joint replacement rehabilitation. Paper presented at: Annual Conference of the American Congress of Rehabil- itation Medicine; October 5, 2007; Washington, DC.
  5. [74]74. Horn S, Sharkey S, Rimmasch H. Clinical practice improve- ment: a methodology to improve quality and decrease cost in health care. Oncol Issues. 1997;12(1):16-20.

Authors
Whiteneck, G., Cassaway, J., Dijkers, M., & Jha, A.
Affiliations
  • Craig Hospital (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Cassaway, Julie
Venue
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2009-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
251-259
ISSN
  • 1079-0268 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7723
OpenAlex
W2199745654
Cited by
96
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133N060005, H133A060103, H133N060027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
spinal cord injury, rehabilitation therapy, practice-based evidence, inpatient rehabilitation, intervention documentation, rehabilitation outcomes, patient education, counseling
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries, Databases, Factual, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review