The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management
Open accessAbstract
Despite a changing world in terms of data sharing, availability, and transparency, there are still major resource issues associated with collating datasets that will satisfy the requirements of comprehensive pesticide risk assessments, especially those undertaken at a regional or national scale. In 1996, a long-term project was initiated to begin collating and formatting pesticide data to eventually create a free-to-all repository of data that would provide a comprehensive transparent, harmonized, and managed extensive dataset for all types of pesticide risk assessments. Over the last 20 years, this database has been keeping pace with improving risk assessments, their associated data requirements, and the needs and expectations of database end users. In 2007, the Pesticide Properties DataBase (PPDB) was launched as a free-to-access website. Currently, the PPDB holds data for almost 2300 pesticide active substances and over 700 metabolites. For each substance around 300 parameters are stored, covering human health, environmental quality, and biodiversity risk assessments. With the approach of the twentieth anniversary of the database, this article seeks to elucidate the current data model, data sources, its validation, and quality control processes and describes a number of existing risk assessment applications that depend upon it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale
Tang, F. H. M., Lenzen, M., McBratney, A., & Maggi, F. (2021) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00712-5 · Cited by 1,340
Current Contributions of Organofluorine Compounds to the Agrochemical Industry
Ogawa, Y., Tokunaga, E., Kobayashi, O., Hirai, K., & Shibata, N. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101467 · Cited by 1,253
Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soil: Environmental Pollutants Affecting Crop Health
Rashid, A., Schutte, B. J., Ulery, A., Deyholos, M. K., Sanogo, S., Lehnhoff, E. A., & Beck, L. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13061521 · Cited by 837
Emerging environmental contaminants: A global perspective on policies and regulations
Puri, M., Gandhi, K., & Kumar, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117344 · Cited by 377
Currently and recently used pesticides in Central European arable soils
Hvězdová, M., Kosubová, P., Košíková, M., Scherr, K. E., Šimek, Z., Brodský, L., Šudoma, M., Škulcová, L., Sáňka, M., Svobodová, M., et al. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.049 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, K. A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. J., & Green, A.
- Venue
- Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1050-1064
- ISSN
- 1080-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7860
- OpenAlex
- W2296804791
- Cited by
- 2,044
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242
- The paper
- Lewis, K. A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. J., & Green, A. (2016). An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.