What Can I Learn From This Interaction? A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Student Self-Reflection and Learning in a Standardized Patient Exercise About Disability
Abstract
Patients with disabilities receive fewer health services than the general population, yet they have greater health needs. Similarly, physicians report limited training in disability. The current project examines medical students' learning about disability in a project using individuals with disabilities as medical educators. Family medicine clerkship students (N = 138) across an academic year were videotaped during interviews with standardized patient educators with disabilities and during feedback sessions following the interactions. Qualitative analysis of feedback transcripts identifies three primary areas of integrating learning, reflective practice, and disability: (1) learning how disability impacts the treatment plan, (2) self-reflection and recognizing attitudes about disability, and (3) learning about the practice of medicine generally from the disability exercise. Themes are identified within each of the primary learning areas. Medical student reflection provides evidence of learning to connect disability with pain, everyday life, and treatment. Medical students learned to recognize patients' expertise in their own condition and in health care navigation. Medical students also examined how their language implies attitude. The current investigation provided evidence of the ways examining disability can serve as a cornerstone for building relationship-centered patient care and encouraging reflective practice overall.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly, patients with mental health problems or disabilities.
“Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly,27 31 patients with mental health problems29 or disabilities.48”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Two articles mentioned that patient participation supports students' learning by recognising the complexity of practising medicine.
“Two articles mentioned that patient participation supports students’ learning by recognising the complexity of practising medicine.41 48”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Duggan, A., Bradshaw, Y. S., Carroll, S. E., Rattigan, S. H., & Altman, W.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Duggan, Ashley
- Venue
- Journal of Health Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 797-811
- ISSN
- 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0415
- OpenAlex
- W1966715572
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- disability, medical students, self-reflection, reflective practice, standardized patients, family medicine clerkship, attitudes toward disability, patient-provider relationship, health care navigation, relationship-centered care, medical education
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Clerkship, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Students, Medical, Patient Simulation, Problem-Based Learning, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review