Cited by 60Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

What Can I Learn From This Interaction? A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Student Self-Reflection and Learning in a Standardized Patient Exercise About Disability

Duggan, Ashley, Bradshaw, Ylisabyth S., Carroll, Shannon E., Rattigan, Sara H., Altman, Wayne·2009·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

Patients with disabilities receive fewer health services than the general population, yet they have greater health needs. Similarly, physicians report limited training in disability. The current project examines medical students' learning about disability in a project using individuals with disabilities as medical educators. Family medicine clerkship students (N = 138) across an academic year were videotaped during interviews with standardized patient educators with disabilities and during feedback sessions following the interactions. Qualitative analysis of feedback transcripts identifies three primary areas of integrating learning, reflective practice, and disability: (1) learning how disability impacts the treatment plan, (2) self-reflection and recognizing attitudes about disability, and (3) learning about the practice of medicine generally from the disability exercise. Themes are identified within each of the primary learning areas. Medical student reflection provides evidence of learning to connect disability with pain, everyday life, and treatment. Medical students learned to recognize patients' expertise in their own condition and in health care navigation. Medical students also examined how their language implies attitude. The current investigation provided evidence of the ways examining disability can serve as a cornerstone for building relationship-centered patient care and encouraging reflective practice overall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730903295526

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly, patients with mental health problems or disabilities.

    “Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly,27 31 patients with mental health problems29 or disabilities.48”
  • Two articles mentioned that patient participation supports students' learning by recognising the complexity of practising medicine.

    “Two articles mentioned that patient participation supports students’ learning by recognising the complexity of practising medicine.41 48”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 60

Authors
Duggan, A., Bradshaw, Y. S., Carroll, S. E., Rattigan, S. H., & Altman, W.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Duggan, Ashley
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
797-811
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W1966715572
Cited by
60
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
disability, medical students, self-reflection, reflective practice, standardized patients, family medicine clerkship, attitudes toward disability, patient-provider relationship, health care navigation, relationship-centered care, medical education
MeSH terms
Clinical Clerkship, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Students, Medical, Patient Simulation, Problem-Based Learning, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review