Comparison of different artificial neural network architectures in modeling of Chlorella sp. flocculation
Abstract
Biodiesel production from microalgae feedstock should be performed after growth and harvesting of the cells, and the most feasible method for harvesting and dewatering of microalgae is flocculation. Flocculation modeling can be used for evaluation and prediction of its performance under different affective parameters. However, the modeling of flocculation in microalgae is not simple and has not performed yet, under all experimental conditions, mostly due to different behaviors of microalgae cells during the process under different flocculation conditions. In the current study, the modeling of microalgae flocculation is studied with different neural network architectures. Microalgae species, Chlorella sp., was flocculated with ferric chloride under different conditions and then the experimental data modeled using artificial neural network. Neural network architectures of multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function architectures, failed to predict the targets successfully, though, modeling was effective with ensemble architecture of MLP networks. Comparison between the performances of the ensemble and each individual network explains the ability of the ensemble architecture in microalgae flocculation modeling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional neural networks such as RBF and MLP were not able to obtain optimal results with strong generalization abilities for modelling Chlorella sp. flocculation.
“Conventional NN ' s (CNN) such as RBF and MLP were not able to obtain optimal results with strong generalization abilities.”
From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Zenooz, A. M., Ashtiani, F. Z., Ranjbar, R., Nikbakht, F., & Bolouri, O.
- Affiliations
- Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Ashtiani, Farzin Zokaee
- Venue
- Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 570-577
- ISSN
- 1082-6068 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2297
- OpenAlex
- W2562879963
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- Chlorella, neural network architecture, neural network ensembles, multilayer perceptron, radial basis function neural network, ferric chloride, microalgae harvesting, biodiesel feedstock
- MeSH terms
- Chlorella, Chlorides, Computer Simulation, Ferric Compounds, Flocculation, Models, Biological, Models, Chemical, Neural Networks, Computer, Biofuels, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review