The Relationship between School Absenteeism and Substance Use: An Integrative Literature Review
Abstract
Background: Chronic school absenteeism is prevalent among high school students in the United States. Its impacts on academic success and health are cause for concern. One specific area of concern is its relationship to youth substance use; chronic absenteeism is associated with using alcohol, marijuana, tobacco, and other drugs. Despite important findings, absent from the literature is a recent and systematic synthesis of related research. Objective: We aimed to examine the literature to provide a better understanding of the relationship between chronic school absenteeism and the use of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and other drugs among U.S. high school students. Methods: We conducted an integrative review of existing peer-reviewed literature using key terms in five databases from the education and health sectors. We included English-language, quantitative and qualitative studies published between 1992 and October 2017 and focused on U.S. students in grades 9 through 12 and between ages 13 and 21. We extracted data and study quality measures for included studies. Results: After screening 3,130 articles using titles and abstracts and reviewing 99 full-text articles, 37 met inclusion criteria. Most were cross-sectional, used local-level data, widely varied in sampling, were of limited generalizability, and simultaneously considered school absenteeism and the use of multiple substances. Due to methodological issues, the relationship between chronic absenteeism and substance use is difficult to fully understand. Conclusions: We confirm the connection between school absenteeism and substance use among U.S. youth, highlight a limited understanding of how and why this relationship manifests, and call for absenteeism research that uses longitudinal methods, national data, and clearly articulated methodologies and self-appraised limitations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic absenteeism has been associated with several negative outcomes, including lower test scores, reduced educational and social engagement, lower rates of high school completion, and higher rates of substance use.
“Chronic absenteeism has been associated with several negative outcomes, including lower test scores,2,3,4 a reduction in educational and social engagement,2 lower rates of high school completion,4,5 and higher rates of substance use.6”
From Virtual Learning in Kindergarten Through Grade 12 During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Chronic Absenteeism (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Gakh, M., Coughenour, C., Assoumou, B. O., & Vanderstelt, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Coughenour, Courtney
- Venue
- Substance Use & Misuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-12-05
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 491-502
- ISSN
- 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2491
- OpenAlex
- W2993065228
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- adolescent substance use, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, tobacco use, high school students, adolescent drug use, academic performance, methodological limitations
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Schools, Students, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review