Cited by 140Health disparities and outcomesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesHomelessness and Social Issues

Poor housing quality: Prevalence and health effects

Baker, Emma, Lester, Laurence H., Bentley, Rebecca, Beer, Andrew·2016·Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community

Abstract

Housing is a central component of productive, healthy, and meaningful lives, and a principle social determinant of health and well-being. Surprisingly, though, evidence on the ways that housing influences health in Australia is poorly developed. This stems largely from the fact that the majority of the population are accommodated in good quality housing. The dominance of a "good housing paradigm" means that households living in poor quality and unhealthy housing are doubly disadvantaged-by the quality of their housing and because policy makers in Australia do not acknowledge the health effects of housing. In this article, we examine the relationship between health outcomes and quality of housing. We base our analysis on data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, a panel dataset that is representative across Australia. We find a sizeable, policy-important, and to date under-acknowledged cohort of Australians whose health is influenced by poor-condition dwellings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10852352.2016.1197714

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Growing international evidence indicates that disparities in housing are patterned along with other social, demographic, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to the cumulative burden of persistent poor health outcomes in affected groups.

    “Growing international evidence indicates that disparities in housing are patterned along with other social, demographic, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to the cumulative burden of persistent poor health outcomes in affected groups (3, 4, 57, 76).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 140

Authors
Baker, E., Lester, L. H., Bentley, R., & Beer, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Baker, Emma
Venue
Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community
Published
2016-08-11
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
219-232
ISSN
  • 0270-3114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1085-2352
  • 1540-7330
OpenAlex
W2512326173
Cited by
140
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
housing conditions, health effects of housing, social determinants of health, health disparities, housing policy, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Female, Health Status, Housing, Humans, Income, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Age Distribution, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review