Poor housing quality: Prevalence and health effects
Abstract
Housing is a central component of productive, healthy, and meaningful lives, and a principle social determinant of health and well-being. Surprisingly, though, evidence on the ways that housing influences health in Australia is poorly developed. This stems largely from the fact that the majority of the population are accommodated in good quality housing. The dominance of a "good housing paradigm" means that households living in poor quality and unhealthy housing are doubly disadvantaged-by the quality of their housing and because policy makers in Australia do not acknowledge the health effects of housing. In this article, we examine the relationship between health outcomes and quality of housing. We base our analysis on data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, a panel dataset that is representative across Australia. We find a sizeable, policy-important, and to date under-acknowledged cohort of Australians whose health is influenced by poor-condition dwellings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Growing international evidence indicates that disparities in housing are patterned along with other social, demographic, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to the cumulative burden of persistent poor health outcomes in affected groups.
“Growing international evidence indicates that disparities in housing are patterned along with other social, demographic, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to the cumulative burden of persistent poor health outcomes in affected groups (3, 4, 57, 76).”
From Review of the Impact of Housing Quality on Inequalities in Health and Well-Being (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Baker, E., Lester, L. H., Bentley, R., & Beer, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Emma
- Venue
- Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-232
- ISSN
- 0270-3114 (ISSN-L)
- 1085-2352
- 1540-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2512326173
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- housing conditions, health effects of housing, social determinants of health, health disparities, housing policy, Australia
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Female, Health Status, Housing, Humans, Income, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Age Distribution, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review