Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protective Costs Orders and Costs Capping Orders: The New Law

Lock QC, David, Mills, Alistair·2016·Judicial Review

Abstract

1. There has been considerable litigation in recent years about the circumstances in which individuals and non-profit organisations can use the courts to challenge unlawful decisions by public bodi...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10854681.2016.1229856

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lock QC, D., & Mills, A.
Affiliations
Landmark Chambers
Venue
Judicial Review
Published
2016-07-02
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
154-161
ISSN
  • 1085-4681
  • 1757-8434
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review