Cited by 109Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesReading and Literacy DevelopmentMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Preservice Teachers' Perspectives on why Every Teacher is not a Teacher of Reading: A Qualitative Analysis

O'Brien, David G., Stewart, Roger A.·1990·Journal of Reading Behavior

Abstract

Although content reading courses are mandated in a majority of states for preservice secondary teachers in a variety of teaching endorsement areas, these prospective teachers often resist such courses, viewing them as irrelevant to their future success as teachers. In order to better understand this resistance, dimensions of preservice teachers' resistance to content reading instruction were examined through a discussion of a qualitative analysis of five data sources. The overall analysis indicated that preservice teachers hold misconceptions about content reading common among their practicing peers; such surface misconceptions are easy to counter. However, in addition, we found a dimension of the resistance deeply rooted in beliefs and traditions of school life relating to teachers' roles and allegiance to content disciplines; these complex misconceptions are more resilient. Suggestions are offered for modifying preservice content reading courses so that preservice teachers can confront the deeply rooted beliefs and traditions that run counter to the tenets and pedagogy associated with content reading courses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10862969009547699

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preservice teachers are skeptical about the efficacy of teaching and learning strategies offered by content literacy research, and inservice teachers rarely enact such strategies in their subject area classrooms.

    “A significant body of research over the last 20 years has demonstrated that preservice teachers are skeptical about the efficacy of teaching and learning strategies offered by content literacy research, and inservice teachers rarely enact such strategies in their subject area classrooms (Alvermann & Moore, 1991;Holt-Reynolds, 1992;O'Brien & Stewart, 1990;Ratekin, Simpson, Alvermann, & Dishner, 198”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Brien, D. G., & Stewart, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University
  • University of Wyoming (US)
Venue
Journal of Reading Behavior
Published
1990-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
101-129
ISSN
0022-4111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109837989
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reading Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
pre-service teachers, teacher preparation, teacher beliefs, teacher role, secondary school teacher training, course design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review