What's after “What's That?”: Preservice Teachers Learning to Ask Literary Questions
Abstract
This year-long study analyzed the effects of using carefully assisted case studies to prepare preservice teachers to be more knowledgeable and skilled in supporting children's response to literature. As part of an undergraduate course in children's literature, 43 preservice teachers read weekly to individually selected children. The purposes of the assignment were (a) to expand the preservice teachers' understandings of response to literature by analyzing an individual child's responses over time and (b) to enhance their instructional strategies and critical stances toward literature. Over time, preservice teachers' question types shifted in amount and content, moving from teacher dominance to child-teacher dialogue. Within the dialogue, the preservice teachers learned to create or at least reflect on a balance between comfort and challenge. As the preservice teachers changed, the children changed as well, moving from hesitancy to confidence, even to the point of contradicting the preservice teachers. Additionally, the course emphasis on questioning as well as on detailed fieldnotes heightened preservice teachers' attention to the results of their own questioning strategies, causing them to be more reflective about the content and consequences of their queries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary research has shown that working more intimately with a smaller number of students in an out-of-school setting can be very effective in supporting teacher learning and development.
“Although preliminary research has shown that working more intimately with a smaller number of students in an out-of-school setting can be very effective in supporting teacher learning and development (Wolf, Mieras, & Carey 1996), few teacher preparation programs capitalize on these affordances by including these types of experiences.”
From Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation (2007) · cites this paper as Wolf, Mieras, & Carey 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation
Luehmann, A. L. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20209 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolf, S. A., Mieras, E. L., & Carey, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Literacy Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-497
- ISSN
- 1086-296X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8430
- OpenAlex
- W2122554219
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Literacy Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- pre-service teachers, children's literature education, teacher-child dialogue, case studies, teacher reflection, field notes, questioning strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review