Cited by 23Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesLiteracy and Educational PracticesReading and Literacy Development

What's after “What's That?”: Preservice Teachers Learning to Ask Literary Questions

Wolf, Shelby A., Mieras, Erikka L., Carey, Angela A.·1996·Journal of Literacy Research

Abstract

This year-long study analyzed the effects of using carefully assisted case studies to prepare preservice teachers to be more knowledgeable and skilled in supporting children's response to literature. As part of an undergraduate course in children's literature, 43 preservice teachers read weekly to individually selected children. The purposes of the assignment were (a) to expand the preservice teachers' understandings of response to literature by analyzing an individual child's responses over time and (b) to enhance their instructional strategies and critical stances toward literature. Over time, preservice teachers' question types shifted in amount and content, moving from teacher dominance to child-teacher dialogue. Within the dialogue, the preservice teachers learned to create or at least reflect on a balance between comfort and challenge. As the preservice teachers changed, the children changed as well, moving from hesitancy to confidence, even to the point of contradicting the preservice teachers. Additionally, the course emphasis on questioning as well as on detailed fieldnotes heightened preservice teachers' attention to the results of their own questioning strategies, causing them to be more reflective about the content and consequences of their queries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10862969609547937

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary research has shown that working more intimately with a smaller number of students in an out-of-school setting can be very effective in supporting teacher learning and development.

    “Although preliminary research has shown that working more intimately with a smaller number of students in an out-of-school setting can be very effective in supporting teacher learning and development (Wolf, Mieras, & Carey 1996), few teacher preparation programs capitalize on these affordances by including these types of experiences.”

    From Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation (2007) · cites this paper as Wolf, Mieras, & Carey 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, S. A., Mieras, E. L., & Carey, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Literacy Research
Published
1996-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
459-497
ISSN
  • 1086-296X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8430
OpenAlex
W2122554219
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Literacy Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
pre-service teachers, children's literature education, teacher-child dialogue, case studies, teacher reflection, field notes, questioning strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review