Cited by 393Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER)

Kim, Young-Suk Grace·2017·Scientific Studies of Reading

Abstract

Pathways of relations of language, cognitive, and literacy skills (i.e., working memory, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, inference, comprehension monitoring, word reading, and listening comprehension) to reading comprehension were examined by comparing four variations of direct and indirect effects model of reading. Results from 350 English-speaking second graders revealed that language and cognitive component skills had direct and indirect relations to listening comprehension, explaining 86% of variance. Word reading and listening comprehension completely mediated the relations of language and cognitive component skills to reading comprehension and explained virtually all the variance in reading comprehension. Total effects of component skills varied from small to substantial. The findings support the direct and indirect effects model of reading model and indicate that word reading and listening comprehension are upper-level skills that are built on multiple language and cognitive component skills, which have direct and indirect relations among themselves. The results underscore the importance of understanding nature of relations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Better understanding of characters' intentions or emotions could aid forming a mental model of the text or help draw inferences important for comprehension.

    “It is argued that better understanding of character ' s intentions or emotions could aid forming a mental model of the text or help draw inferences that are important for comprehension (Dore et al., 2018; Kim, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y.-S. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young-Suk Grace
Venue
Scientific Studies of Reading
Published
2017-03-20
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
310-333
ISSN
  • 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-799X
OpenAlex
W2603483389
Cited by
393
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
58.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Funders
Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130131)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
Simple View of Reading, reading comprehension, word reading, listening comprehension, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, inference, comprehension monitoring, working memory, second grade students, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review