Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER)
Abstract
Pathways of relations of language, cognitive, and literacy skills (i.e., working memory, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, inference, comprehension monitoring, word reading, and listening comprehension) to reading comprehension were examined by comparing four variations of direct and indirect effects model of reading. Results from 350 English-speaking second graders revealed that language and cognitive component skills had direct and indirect relations to listening comprehension, explaining 86% of variance. Word reading and listening comprehension completely mediated the relations of language and cognitive component skills to reading comprehension and explained virtually all the variance in reading comprehension. Total effects of component skills varied from small to substantial. The findings support the direct and indirect effects model of reading model and indicate that word reading and listening comprehension are upper-level skills that are built on multiple language and cognitive component skills, which have direct and indirect relations among themselves. The results underscore the importance of understanding nature of relations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Better understanding of characters' intentions or emotions could aid forming a mental model of the text or help draw inferences important for comprehension.
“It is argued that better understanding of character ' s intentions or emotions could aid forming a mental model of the text or help draw inferences that are important for comprehension (Dore et al., 2018; Kim, 2017).”
From Longitudinal development of theory of mind in adolescence and its associations with fiction reading experience. (2025) · cites this paper as Kim, 2017
Cites
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Yao, B., Ritchie, D., Wu, T., Yu, M., Wang, D., & Li, T. J.-J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517479 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Language and Reading Research Consortium, Currie, N. K., & Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000342 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
van der Kleij, S. W., Devine, R. T., Shapiro, L. R., Ricketts, J., & Apperly, I. (2025) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001965 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-S. G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Young-Suk Grace
- ORCID
- Kim, Young-Suk Grace
- Venue
- Scientific Studies of Reading
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-03-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 310-333
- ISSN
- 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-799X
- OpenAlex
- W2603483389
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 58.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion)
- Grantee Submission
- Funders
- Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130131)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- Simple View of Reading, reading comprehension, word reading, listening comprehension, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, inference, comprehension monitoring, working memory, second grade students, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review