In situ microbial bioremediation of obsolete pesticides at their disposal sites
Abstract
Soil pollution by pesticides is a global problem in many countries, including Kyrgyzstan. Currently, 50 storage facilities for obsolete banned pesticides exist, severely threatening the surrounding populations and environment. In this study, in situ bioremediation technology was used to remove pesticide contamination from soil around the storage facilities. Three conditions were tested: application of fertile soil and bioproduct, application of fertile soil and no bioproduct (Control 1), and application of fertile soil and no bioproduct (Control 2). An aerobic bioremediation approach was used: the treatment was applied directly to the contaminated soil. For the bioaugmentation, three selected active degrading bacterial species were used: Stenotrophomonas sp. (Ps-B strain), L. fusiformis (SA-4 strain) and E. cloacae (SB-2 strain). Regular aeration, loosening and watering were performed during the subsequent months to create the conditions required to activate the local microflora and the degrading activity of the bacterial species in the bioproduct. The bioproduct of three active bacteria species has demonstrated a high pesticide decomposition effect. The pesticides were degraded from 85.6 to 99.0 ± 0.05% within six months of initiating the bioremediation process. The efficiency of the degradation process depended on optimum atmospheric conditions, that is, temperature, pH, and moisture content of the soil. Our study recommends using the agrotechnical and biotechnological appr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In-situ bioremediation using Stenotrophomonas sp., Lysinibacillus fusiformis, and Enterobacter cloacae degraded 85.6 to 99% of pesticides in Kyrgyzstan within 6 months.
“in-situ bioremediation using Stenotrophomonas sp., Lysinibacillus fusiformis, and Enterobacter cloacae successfully degraded 85.6 to 99% of pesticides in Kyrgyzstan within 6 months [95].”
From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [95]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qattan, S. Y. A. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01103-y · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Doolotkeldieva, T., Konurbaeva, M., & Bobusheva, S.
- Affiliations
- Plant Protection Department, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University
- Kyrgyz-Türkish Manas Üniversity (KG)
- Venue
- Bioremediation Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-04-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 220-237
- ISSN
- 1088-9868 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6529
- OpenAlex
- W4395455894
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioremediation Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Technical Assistance in Implementation of Trails on Bioremediation of PDPs Contaminated Soils Project (GCP/SEC/011/GFF)
- The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
- Keywords
- in situ bioremediation, pesticide-contaminated soil, bioaugmentation, aerobic bioremediation, Stenotrophomonas, Enterobacter cloacae, pesticide degradation, soil aeration, Kyrgyzstan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review