High school girls’ experience of victimization by boys: Where sexual harassment meets aggression
Abstract
School-based research into sexual harassment, on the one hand, and aggression (including bullying) on the other, originate from different disciplinary traditions, but are beginning to connect. We examined whether the sexual harassment of high school girls by boys can be regarded as a form of aggression. Year 8 to 10 girls from 5 coeducational high schools (N = 679) responded to a 24-item version of the Direct and Indirect Aggression Scale, including 6 new sexually toned items; participants indicated how often they experienced each behavior. Principal components analysis identified 4 components: direct aggression, psychological aggression, cyberbullying, and sexual harassment. The latter included the more intrusive sexually toned behaviors, whereas verbal sexualized insults were a component of psychological aggression—the component that most strongly undermined girls’ sense of safety at school. Research and policies on school peer victimization need to explicitly include sexual aspects, in recognition of the harmfulness of such “everyday” psychological aggression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The anonymity, asynchrony, and lack of geographic and temporal limits of the Internet create a strong power imbalance between victim and aggressor, making even a single episode sufficient to experience victimization.
“The anonymity, asynchrony, and lack of geographic and temporal limits of the Internet create a strong power imbalance between victim and aggressor, making even a single episode sufficient to experience victimization [25,46,47,48,49].”
From Cybervictimization and Online Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Association, and Predictors (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Sexual harassment includes sexual harms, while cyberbullying is often sexualized, and no distinction is made in measurement between non-sexualized and sexualized forms.
“Furthermore, some behaviors are also shared between the two phenomena: sexual harassment includes sexual harms [24], while cyberbullying is often sexualized, and no distinction is made in the measurement between non-sexualized and sexualized forms [22,25].”
From Cybervictimization and Online Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Association, and Predictors (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Shute, Rosalyn
- Venue
- Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-285
- ISSN
- 1092-6771 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-083X
- OpenAlex
- W2333962767
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- sexual harassment, aggression, bullying, high school girls, peer victimization, psychological aggression, cyberbullying, school safety, co-educational schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review