Cited by 18Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesWorkplace Violence and Bullying

High school girls’ experience of victimization by boys: Where sexual harassment meets aggression

Shute, Rosalyn, Owens, Larry, Slee, Phillip·2016·Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma

Abstract

School-based research into sexual harassment, on the one hand, and aggression (including bullying) on the other, originate from different disciplinary traditions, but are beginning to connect. We examined whether the sexual harassment of high school girls by boys can be regarded as a form of aggression. Year 8 to 10 girls from 5 coeducational high schools (N = 679) responded to a 24-item version of the Direct and Indirect Aggression Scale, including 6 new sexually toned items; participants indicated how often they experienced each behavior. Principal components analysis identified 4 components: direct aggression, psychological aggression, cyberbullying, and sexual harassment. The latter included the more intrusive sexually toned behaviors, whereas verbal sexualized insults were a component of psychological aggression—the component that most strongly undermined girls’ sense of safety at school. Research and policies on school peer victimization need to explicitly include sexual aspects, in recognition of the harmfulness of such “everyday” psychological aggression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10926771.2015.1129656

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anonymity, asynchrony, and lack of geographic and temporal limits of the Internet create a strong power imbalance between victim and aggressor, making even a single episode sufficient to experience victimization.

    “The anonymity, asynchrony, and lack of geographic and temporal limits of the Internet create a strong power imbalance between victim and aggressor, making even a single episode sufficient to experience victimization [25,46,47,48,49].”
  • Sexual harassment includes sexual harms, while cyberbullying is often sexualized, and no distinction is made in measurement between non-sexualized and sexualized forms.

    “Furthermore, some behaviors are also shared between the two phenomena: sexual harassment includes sexual harms [24], while cyberbullying is often sexualized, and no distinction is made in the measurement between non-sexualized and sexualized forms [22,25].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 18

Authors
Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Shute, Rosalyn
Venue
Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
269-285
ISSN
  • 1092-6771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-083X
OpenAlex
W2333962767
Cited by
18
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
sexual harassment, aggression, bullying, high school girls, peer victimization, psychological aggression, cyberbullying, school safety, co-educational schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review