Kerosene: A Review of Household Uses and their Hazards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Open accessAbstract
Kerosene has been an important household fuel since the mid-19th century. In developed countries its use has greatly declined because of electrification. However, in developing countries, kerosene use for cooking and lighting remains widespread. This review focuses on household kerosene uses, mainly in developing countries, their associated emissions, and their hazards. Kerosene is often advocated as a cleaner alternative to solid fuels, biomass and coal, for cooking, and kerosene lamps are frequently used when electricity is unavailable. Globally, an estimated 500 million households still use fuels, particularly kerosene, for lighting. However, there are few studies, study designs and quality are varied, and results are inconsistent. Well-documented kerosene hazards are poisonings, fires, and explosions. Less investigated are exposures to and risks from kerosene's combustion products. Some kerosene-using devices emit substantial amounts of fine particulates, carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxides (NO(x)), and sulfur dioxide (SO(2)). Studies of kerosene used for cooking or lighting provide some evidence that emissions may impair lung function and increase infectious illness (including tuberculosis), asthma, and cancer risks. However, there are few study designs, quality is varied, and results are inconsistent. Considering the widespread use in the developing world of kerosene, the scarcity of adequate epidemiologic investigations, the potential for harm, and the implications for national energy policies, researchers are strongly encouraged to consider collecting data on household kerosene uses in studies of health in developing countries. Given the potential risks of kerosene, policymakers may consider alternatives to kerosene subsidies, such as shifting support to cleaner technologies for lighting and cooking.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fossil fuel-derived particles that are inhaled deposit in tissue and enter the systemic circulation readily, and they may be more toxic than biomass burning particles.
“Inhaled fossil fuel-derived particles have been found to have high tissue deposition and penetration into the systemic circulation 23,24, and may be more toxic than particles resulting from biomass burning 17,25.”
From Effect of a solar lighting intervention on fuel-based lighting use and exposure to household air pollution in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation is attached to the comparison with biomass-burning particles, not the preceding deposition claim. In Human Exposures and Pollutant Emissions > Cooking (page unavailable), the review reports a higher emission factor for genotoxic PAHs from kerosene stoves than from wood, which lends limited support to a possible toxicity difference. But Toxicology > Combustion Products (page unavailable) says the effect of combustion source on particle toxicity has been less studied; the copy does not establish that fossil fuel-derived particles are more toxic than biomass-burning particles. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWithout electricity, households may use kerosene lamps, candles, and other polluting fuel-based lighting as temporary illumination.
“In the absence of electricity, households may turn to kerosene lamps, candles, and other polluting fuel-based lighting devices as a stopgap technology for illumination17.”
From Effect of a solar lighting intervention on fuel-based lighting use and exposure to household air pollution in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
The Household Uses section says kerosene lamps are common where electricity is unavailable or unreliable, and the Lighting section describes a simple-wick lamp also called a “kerosene candle.” The paper does not establish that households use ordinary candles or that fuel-based lighting is a temporary stopgap; it describes kerosene as often the primary lighting fuel. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredKerosene lamp emissions contain many health-damaging pollutants.
“Kerosene lamp emissions contain many health-damaging pollutants (Lam et al., 2012).”
From Kerosene-based lighting: an overlooked source of exposure to household air pollution? (2020) · cites this paper as Lam et al., 2012
Poisonings, fires, and explosions are well-documented kerosene hazards.
“Poisonings, fires, and explosions are well-documented kerosene hazards [27].”
From Social Impacts of Solar Home Systems in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Bangladesh (2017) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 443
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hiramatsu M Kameyama T Nabeshima T Penney DG 1996 Carbon monoxide-induced impairment of learning, memory, and neuronal dysfunction Carbon monoxide 187 204 Boca Raton, FL CRC Press
- Authors
- Lam, N. L., Smith, K. R., Gauthier, A., & Bates, M. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Michael N.
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 396-432
- ISSN
- 1093-7404 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-6950
- PMC
- PMC3664014
- OpenAlex
- W2083398451
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R25ES016252, R01ES019624)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- kerosene, household fuel, kerosene lamps, cooking fuel, indoor air pollution, combustion emissions, PM2.5, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, sulfur dioxide, kerosene poisoning, fire and explosion, lung function, tuberculosis, asthma, cancer risk, infectious diseases, low- and middle-income countries, energy policy
- MeSH terms
- Aerosols, Cooking, Family Characteristics, Humans, Kerosene, Nitric Oxide, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Sulfur Dioxide, Air Pollution, Indoor, Particulate Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review