Cited by 443Energy and Environment ImpactsAir Quality and Health ImpactsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Kerosene: A Review of Household Uses and their Hazards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Open access
Lam, Nicholas L., Smith, Kirk R., Gauthier, Alison, Bates, Michael N.·2012·Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B

Abstract

Kerosene has been an important household fuel since the mid-19th century. In developed countries its use has greatly declined because of electrification. However, in developing countries, kerosene use for cooking and lighting remains widespread. This review focuses on household kerosene uses, mainly in developing countries, their associated emissions, and their hazards. Kerosene is often advocated as a cleaner alternative to solid fuels, biomass and coal, for cooking, and kerosene lamps are frequently used when electricity is unavailable. Globally, an estimated 500 million households still use fuels, particularly kerosene, for lighting. However, there are few studies, study designs and quality are varied, and results are inconsistent. Well-documented kerosene hazards are poisonings, fires, and explosions. Less investigated are exposures to and risks from kerosene's combustion products. Some kerosene-using devices emit substantial amounts of fine particulates, carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxides (NO(x)), and sulfur dioxide (SO(2)). Studies of kerosene used for cooking or lighting provide some evidence that emissions may impair lung function and increase infectious illness (including tuberculosis), asthma, and cancer risks. However, there are few study designs, quality is varied, and results are inconsistent. Considering the widespread use in the developing world of kerosene, the scarcity of adequate epidemiologic investigations, the potential for harm, and the implications for national energy policies, researchers are strongly encouraged to consider collecting data on household kerosene uses in studies of health in developing countries. Given the potential risks of kerosene, policymakers may consider alternatives to kerosene subsidies, such as shifting support to cleaner technologies for lighting and cooking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10937404.2012.710134

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fossil fuel-derived particles that are inhaled deposit in tissue and enter the systemic circulation readily, and they may be more toxic than biomass burning particles.

    “Inhaled fossil fuel-derived particles have been found to have high tissue deposition and penetration into the systemic circulation 23,24, and may be more toxic than particles resulting from biomass burning 17,25.”

    From Effect of a solar lighting intervention on fuel-based lighting use and exposure to household air pollution in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The citation is attached to the comparison with biomass-burning particles, not the preceding deposition claim. In Human Exposures and Pollutant Emissions > Cooking (page unavailable), the review reports a higher emission factor for genotoxic PAHs from kerosene stoves than from wood, which lends limited support to a possible toxicity difference. But Toxicology > Combustion Products (page unavailable) says the effect of combustion source on particle toxicity has been less studied; the copy does not establish that fossil fuel-derived particles are more toxic than biomass-burning particles. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Without electricity, households may use kerosene lamps, candles, and other polluting fuel-based lighting as temporary illumination.

    “In the absence of electricity, households may turn to kerosene lamps, candles, and other polluting fuel-based lighting devices as a stopgap technology for illumination17.”

    From Effect of a solar lighting intervention on fuel-based lighting use and exposure to household air pollution in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Household Uses section says kerosene lamps are common where electricity is unavailable or unreliable, and the Lighting section describes a simple-wick lamp also called a “kerosene candle.” The paper does not establish that households use ordinary candles or that fuel-based lighting is a temporary stopgap; it describes kerosene as often the primary lighting fuel. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kerosene lamp emissions contain many health-damaging pollutants.

    “Kerosene lamp emissions contain many health-damaging pollutants (Lam et al., 2012).”
  • Poisonings, fires, and explosions are well-documented kerosene hazards.

    “Poisonings, fires, and explosions are well-documented kerosene hazards [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 114 · Cited by 443

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hiramatsu M Kameyama T Nabeshima T Penney DG 1996 Carbon monoxide-induced impairment of learning, memory, and neuronal dysfunction Carbon monoxide 187 204 Boca Raton, FL CRC Press

Authors
Lam, N. L., Smith, K. R., Gauthier, A., & Bates, M. N.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Bates, Michael N.
Venue
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B
Published
2012-08
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
396-432
ISSN
  • 1093-7404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-6950
OpenAlex
W2083398451
Cited by
443
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R25ES016252, R01ES019624)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
kerosene, household fuel, kerosene lamps, cooking fuel, indoor air pollution, combustion emissions, PM2.5, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, sulfur dioxide, kerosene poisoning, fire and explosion, lung function, tuberculosis, asthma, cancer risk, infectious diseases, low- and middle-income countries, energy policy
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Cooking, Family Characteristics, Humans, Kerosene, Nitric Oxide, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Sulfur Dioxide, Air Pollution, Indoor, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review