The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES
Abstract
Since the introduction of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites in the early 1940s, composite materials development was driven by the needs of space, defense, and aircraft industries where performance rather than cost was the prime consideration. At the beginning, conventional machining techniques were adopted to machine glass fiber-reinforced composites for convenience as well as to keep the capital costs down. This was followed by significant advancements in tool materials and tooling design. With the development of new and more challenging metal-matrix and ceramic-matrix composites, conventional manufacturing processes proved to be inadequate or even inappropriate to process them. Need and opportunity, therefore, exists for alternate nontraditional machining operations, such as laser machining, water jet (WJ) and abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting, electrical discharge machining, ultrasonic-assisted machining, and electrochemical spark machining. When composites become more popular and are used in large volume in the civilian sector, such as auto and other consumer industries, material and processing costs will be the driving factors. A high degree of automation for the mass manufacturing of composite parts will be required to bring the costs down and compete with other materials. Advancements in the nontraditional machining processes offer an opportunity to process these materials economically, thus realizing the full potential of the composite materials. This paper gives a broad overview on the various issues involved in machining (conventional and nonconventional) of fiber-reinforced composites. The field of composites, in general, and machining of composites, in particular, are so broad that it would not be possible to do justice by discussing each aspect of composite material machining without ending up with a voluminous document. This review, therefore has to be limited to a few aspects of composite materials and their machining techniques. It may also be pointed out that in this review certain areas are dealt more in-depth than others. Personal preferences and availability of material in the open literature are some of the reasons for this nonuniformity in coverage. Also, some areas are more actively pursued than others. An attempt is made to highlight some of the issues and opportunities in the area of machining of composites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the machining of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) composite laminates
Bhatnagar, N., Ramakrishnan, N., Naik, N. K., & Komanduri, R. (1995) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/0890-6955(95)93039-9 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudy of drilling of composite material and aluminium stack
Zitoune, R., Krishnaraj, V., & Collombet, F. (2010) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.010 · Cited by 323
Isbilir, O., & Ghassemieh, E. (2013) · Machining Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10910344.2013.806098 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Komanduri, R.
- Venue
- Machining Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-152
- ISSN
- 1091-0344 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2483
- OpenAlex
- W1641481082
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10940349708945641
- The paper
- Komanduri, R. (1997). MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES. Machining Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10940349708945641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.