Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES

Komanduri, Ranga·1997·Machining Science and Technology

Abstract

Since the introduction of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites in the early 1940s, composite materials development was driven by the needs of space, defense, and aircraft industries where performance rather than cost was the prime consideration. At the beginning, conventional machining techniques were adopted to machine glass fiber-reinforced composites for convenience as well as to keep the capital costs down. This was followed by significant advancements in tool materials and tooling design. With the development of new and more challenging metal-matrix and ceramic-matrix composites, conventional manufacturing processes proved to be inadequate or even inappropriate to process them. Need and opportunity, therefore, exists for alternate nontraditional machining operations, such as laser machining, water jet (WJ) and abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting, electrical discharge machining, ultrasonic-assisted machining, and electrochemical spark machining. When composites become more popular and are used in large volume in the civilian sector, such as auto and other consumer industries, material and processing costs will be the driving factors. A high degree of automation for the mass manufacturing of composite parts will be required to bring the costs down and compete with other materials. Advancements in the nontraditional machining processes offer an opportunity to process these materials economically, thus realizing the full potential of the composite materials. This paper gives a broad overview on the various issues involved in machining (conventional and nonconventional) of fiber-reinforced composites. The field of composites, in general, and machining of composites, in particular, are so broad that it would not be possible to do justice by discussing each aspect of composite material machining without ending up with a voluminous document. This review, therefore has to be limited to a few aspects of composite materials and their machining techniques. It may also be pointed out that in this review certain areas are dealt more in-depth than others. Personal preferences and availability of material in the open literature are some of the reasons for this nonuniformity in coverage. Also, some areas are more actively pursued than others. An attempt is made to highlight some of the issues and opportunities in the area of machining of composites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10940349708945641

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Komanduri, R.
Venue
Machining Science and Technology
Published
1997-08
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
113-152
ISSN
  • 1091-0344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2483
OpenAlex
W1641481082
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10940349708945641
The paper
Komanduri, R. (1997). MACHINING OF FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES. Machining Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10940349708945641

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.