Cited by 1,222Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyScience Education and Pedagogy

Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell

Stein, Mary Kay, Engle, Randi A., Smith, Margaret S., Hughes, Elizabeth K.·2008·Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Abstract

Teachers who attempt to use inquiry-based, student-centered instructional tasks face challenges that go beyond identifying well-designed tasks and setting them up appropriately in the classroom. Because solution paths are usually not specified for these kinds of tasks, students tend to approach them in unique and sometimes unanticipated ways. Teachers must not only strive to understand how students are making sense of the task but also begin to align students' disparate ideas and approaches with canonical understandings about the nature of mathematics. Research suggests that this is difficult for most teachers (Ball, 1993 Ball, D. L. 1993. With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 94(4): 373–397. [Google Scholar], 2001 Ball, D. L. 2001. “Teaching, with respect to mathematics and students”. In Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics, Edited by: Wood, T., Nelson, B. S. and Warfield, J. 11–22. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]; Leinhardt & Steele, 2005 Leinhardt, G. and Steele, M. D. 2005. Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1): 87–163. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Schoenfeld, 1998 Schoenfeld, A. S. 1998. Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1): 1–95. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]; Sherin, 2002 Sherin, M. G. 2002. When teaching becomes learning.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10986060802229675

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation structure of the growing-visual-patterns task allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in ways advocated by research.

    “This implementation structure allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in the ways advocated by research in the field (Dunleavy, 2015; Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Stein & Smith, 2008; Webel, 2010).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stein, Mary Kay
  • Engle, Randi A.
Venue
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Published
2008-10-21
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
313-340
ISSN
  • 1098-6065 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7833
OpenAlex
W1983811012
Cited by
1,222
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 41
FWCI
60.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mathematical Thinking and Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
mathematical discussion, student-centered instruction, inquiry-based learning, disciplinary engagement, mathematics education, teaching model, primary school mathematics, classroom discourse, mathematics education research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review