Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell
Abstract
Teachers who attempt to use inquiry-based, student-centered instructional tasks face challenges that go beyond identifying well-designed tasks and setting them up appropriately in the classroom. Because solution paths are usually not specified for these kinds of tasks, students tend to approach them in unique and sometimes unanticipated ways. Teachers must not only strive to understand how students are making sense of the task but also begin to align students' disparate ideas and approaches with canonical understandings about the nature of mathematics. Research suggests that this is difficult for most teachers (Ball, 1993 Ball, D. L. 1993. With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 94(4): 373–397. [Google Scholar], 2001 Ball, D. L. 2001. “Teaching, with respect to mathematics and students”. In Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics, Edited by: Wood, T., Nelson, B. S. and Warfield, J. 11–22. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]; Leinhardt & Steele, 2005 Leinhardt, G. and Steele, M. D. 2005. Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1): 87–163. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Schoenfeld, 1998 Schoenfeld, A. S. 1998. Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1): 1–95. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]; Sherin, 2002 Sherin, M. G. 2002. When teaching becomes learning.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implementation structure of the growing-visual-patterns task allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in ways advocated by research.
“This implementation structure allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in the ways advocated by research in the field (Dunleavy, 2015; Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Stein & Smith, 2008; Webel, 2010).”
From Exercising Mathematical Authority: Three Cases of Preservice Teachers’ Algebraic Justifications (2019) · cites this paper as Stein & Smith, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines
(2019) · doi:10.4324/9781315166933 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Li, J., & Atabas, S. (2024) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312241248514 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Two views of culture and their implications for mathematics teaching and learning
Hodge, L. L., & Cobb, P. (2019) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916641173 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Exercising Mathematical Authority: Three Cases of Preservice Teachers’ Algebraic Justifications
Prasad, P. V., & Barron, V. J. (2019) · The Mathematics Educator · doi:10.63301/tme.v28i2.2050 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In order to decrease students’ reliance on external mathematical authorities and foster their dependence on internal ones, instructors must shift their roles in the classroom (Dunleavy, 2015; Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Stein et al, 2008; Webel, 2010).”
BackgroundMasters, H. L., Lottero‐Perdue, P. S., Placa, N., Galindo, E., Mikeska, J. N., & Howell, H. (2025) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12685 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Edson, A. J., Rogers, D. R., & Browning, C. A. (2020) · Learning and Performance Assessment · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0420-8.ch018
Edson, A. J., Rogers, D. R., & Browning, C. A. (2016) · Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0120-6.ch012
- Authors
- Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Northern Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stein, Mary Kay
- Engle, Randi A.
- ORCID
- Stein, Mary Kay
- Venue
- Mathematical Thinking and Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-10-21
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-340
- ISSN
- 1098-6065 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7833
- OpenAlex
- W1983811012
- Cited by
- 1,222
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 60.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematical Thinking and Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- mathematical discussion, student-centered instruction, inquiry-based learning, disciplinary engagement, mathematics education, teaching model, primary school mathematics, classroom discourse, mathematics education research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review