Cited by 35Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Combination therapy in systemic mycosis

Polak, A.·1990·Journal of Chemotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1120009x.1990.11739020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 35

Authors
Polak, A.
Affiliations
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
Polak, A.
Venue
Journal of Chemotherapy
Published
1990-08
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
211-217
ISSN
  • 1120-009X (ISSN-L)
  • 1973-9478
OpenAlex
W268990559
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
combination therapy, systemic fungal infection, fungal infection, antifungal agents, combination antifungal therapy
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Aspergillosis, Candidiasis, Cryptococcosis, Drug Synergism, Drug Therapy, Combination, Flucytosine, Humans, Mycoses, Prospective Studies, Rifampin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review