The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0
Abstract
This roadmap identifies two developments for improving the process of literature reviewing. First, a method for systematically digitally encoding papers’ core knowledge contributions in the form of a graph is proposed. Second, the creativity literature is reviewed as a source of inspiration for crafting theoretical contributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., & Kupfer, D. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848 · Cited by 1,712
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
(2017) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais · Cited by 1,603
That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
Davis, M. S. (1971) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839317100100211 · Cited by 1,219
Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. V. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,096
Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Montuori, S., Foti, F., Ferraioli, G., Sorrentino, P., & Sorrentino, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509 · Cited by 1,038
Inspired by Distraction: Mind Wandering Facilitates Creative Incubation
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612446024 · Cited by 975
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · Cited by 4,584
Safaei, M., Sundararajan, E. A., Driss, M., Boulila, W., & Shapi'i, A. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104754 · Cited by 720
Perifanis, N.-A., & Kitsios, F. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14020085 · Cited by 407
Artificial intelligence and business strategy towards digital transformation: A research agenda
Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042025 · Cited by 360
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable development goals – A survey
Wang, Q., & Huang, R. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111637 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, R. T., & Webster, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Decision Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 129-147
- ISSN
- 1246-0125 (ISSN-L)
- 2116-7052
- OpenAlex
- W3046077836
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591
- The paper
- Watson, R. T., & Webster, J. (2020). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. Journal of Decision Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
