Cited by 5Memory, Trauma, and CommemorationRace, History, and American SocietyMemory, violence, and history

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Not Forgetting Black Lives Matter: Memory, Protest and Counterpublics

Open access
Ruiz, Pollyanna·2024·Javnost - The Public

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between social networks, protest and memory.It begins by focusing on activists' attempts to supplement official narratives before going on to explore the way the digital offers mechanisms that both ameliorate and heighten the fear of forgetting.It goes beyond an investigation of the role played by "activists" in these dynamics and reflects upon the memory work undertaken by "ordinary people."These arguments are underpinned by an analysis of Black Lives Matter hashtags such as #SayHisName.It argues that the ubiquitous and repetitious sharing of tweets in which the names of those who have died at the hands of the police are hashtagged should be understood as an online commemorative practice similar to that undertaken at in real world vigils.Finally, it highlights the way in which the hashtag #SayHerName draws the public's attention to persistent intersectional inequalities and so expands activist and ordinary people's understandings of police violence in America and beyond.This article concludes by suggesting that the hashtag #SayTheirNames both recalls the individuals who have already died and anticipates the deaths that are yet to come in an effortful and ritualised moment of not forgetting that Black Lives Matter.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13183222.2024.2342743

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • #SayTheirNames functions as a digital memorial practice like virtual vigils.

    “Ruiz [31] analyzes #SayTheirNames as a digital memorial practice that functions like virtual vigils.”

    From Collective memory and social media. (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Posting victim names with a hashtag is both a personal act of remembrance and participation in a broader movement.

    “Posting victim names in combination with the hashtag is both a personal act of remembrance and participation in a broader movement.”

    From Collective memory and social media. (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Alcoff, Linda, and Laura Gray. 1993. “Survivior Discource: Transgression or Recuperation?” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 18: 260–290.
  2. Allan, Stuart. 2013. Citizen Witnessing: Revolutionising Journalism in times of Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
  4. 10.1080/01419870.2017.1334934 · DOI
  5. Burke, Peter. 2011. “History as Social Memory.” In The Collective Memory Reader, edited by J. K. Olick, V. Vinitzky-Seroussi, and D. Ley, 188–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. 10.1177/0267323112441007 · DOI
  7. Carey, James. 2009. Communication as Culture Revised Edition. London: Routledge.
  8. Castells, Manuel. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter Power in the Networked Society.” International Journal of Communication 1:238–266.
  9. 10.1177/1750698007083889 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1461444807081228 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.4159/9780674030305 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/660984 · DOI
  13. Doerr, Nicole. 2014. “Memory and Culture in Social Movements.” In Conceptualising Culture in Social Movements Research, edited by Baumgarten, Britta, Daphi, Priska and Ullrich, Peter, 206–226. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Ferrarotti, Franco. 1990. Time, Memory, and Society. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  15. 10.2307/590801 · DOI
  16. Gainous, Jason, and Kevin M. Wagner. 2014. Tweeting to Power. The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. 10.1215/10407391-13-1-77 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/487737 · DOI
  19. Halbwachs, Maurice. 1950. On Collective Memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  20. 10.1007/978-1-137-00721-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1515/9783110217384.1.91 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1750698016645274 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1086/595632 · DOI
  24. 10.1215/08992363-12-1-21 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931 · DOI
  26. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture; Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York Press.
  27. 10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1518 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/1461444816663485 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0080440118000099 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/02690055.2021.1838789 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1750698020959799 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/14680777.2021.1886142 · DOI
  33. Meier, C. 1996. “Erinnern – Verdrangen – Vergessen.” Merkur 50:937–952.
  34. 10.1177/1368431006060481 · DOI
  35. Negt, Oskar, Alexander Kluge, and Peter Labanyi. 1988. “‘The Public Sphere and Experience’: Selections.” Alexander Kluge: Theoretical Writings, Stories and an Interview 60–82.
  36. Nora, Pierre, ed. 1989. Les Lieux de mémoire. 3 vols. Paris: Gallimard.
  37. Olick, Jeffry. 2011. “Collective Memory: The Two Cultures.” In The Collective Memory Reader, edited by J. K. Olick, V. Vinitzky-Seroussi, and D. Ley, 225–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. 10.1177/14614440222226244 · DOI
  39. 10.17813/maiq.10.2.96746725j1312512 · DOI
  40. Purbrick, Louise. 2023. H Blocks; An Architecture of Conflict in and about Northern Ireland. London: Bloomsbury.
  41. Ricoeur, Paul. 1996. “Memory, Forgetfulness, and History.” The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 45:13–24.
  42. 10.1177/0047244105051158 · DOI
  43. 10.4324/9781003087830-16 · DOI
  44. Ruiz, Pollyanna. 2015. “Police, Protester, Bystander; Unsettling Boundaries in the Public Sphere.” In Media and the Margins: Journalism and Politics, edited by Einar Thorsen, Daniel Jackson, Heather Savigny, and Jenny Alexander, 195–208. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. 10.1177/1470357217701590 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/13183222.2022.2042787 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/hor.2017.114 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/1461444815600280 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/1461444817740822 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/police/paab060 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/hic3.12062 · DOI
  52. 10.1086/229783 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/10350330.2012.664969 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/20563051221080473 · DOI
  55. Wu, Henry H., Ryan J. Gallagher, Thayer Alshaabi, Jane L. Adams, Joshua R. Minot, Michael V. Arnold, Brooke Foucault Welles, et al. 2023. “Say Their Names: Resurgence in the Collective Attention toward Black Victims of Fatal Police Violence Following the Death of George Floyd.” PLoS One 11 (18): 1–26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz, P.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Ruiz, Pollyanna
Venue
Javnost - The Public
Published
2024-04-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
253-269
ISSN
  • 1318-3222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1854-8377
OpenAlex
W4396953327
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Javnost - The Public (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
Black Lives Matter, memory work, hashtag activism, #SayHerName, online commemoration, police brutality, counterpublics, social networks, intersectionality, forgetting, police killings of Black people, online protest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review