Cited by 17Migration and Labor DynamicsIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Who Will Care for Grandma? Older Women, Parent Visas, and Australia’s Migration Program

Open access
Askola, Heli·2016·Australian Feminist Law Journal

Abstract

Despite its substantial size and significance, the operation of Australia’s regular migration program has attracted relatively little feminist legal interest. In the last 30 years the migration program has shifted towards prioritising working-age migrants with a high level of skills (deemed to be) in demand in Australia, but this emphasis on the immediate needs of the labour market has not been investigated in terms of its implications for diverse groups of women. The decline and (near-)abolition of so-called non-contributory parent visas in 2014 is a recent example that particularly affects older women wishing to migrate to join their children. The migration of parents, whether it is motivated by the provision of care for grandchildren or their own future care needs, raises questions about care, a key feminist issue. As the main burden of care has traditionally been placed on women, parent visas offer an important starting point for assessing the gender dimensions of the migration program. With the help of critical feminist perspectives on migration, ageing, as well as transnational families and care, this article starts to critique some of the gender inequalities embedded in Australia’s migrant selection process and its calculations which serve to exclude, among others, older women. After interrogating the problematic assumptions about and treatment of parent migration, the article suggests that the migration program raises difficult feminist questions about solidarity, tra…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13200968.2016.1258750

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Askola, H.
Corresponding author
Askola, Heli
Venue
Australian Feminist Law Journal
Published
2016-07-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
297-319
ISSN
  • 1320-0968 (ISSN-L)
  • 2204-0064
OpenAlex
W2590064811
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Feminist Law Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Keywords
older women, care work, transnational families, aging, migrant selection, solidarity, grandparenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review