The psychological well-being of grandparents who provide supplementary grandchild care: a systematic review
Abstract
This systematic review examines theoretical and empirical research on the psychological well-being of grandparents who provide supplementary care for their grandchildren. The review included 15 articles that met inclusion criteria. Seven of these studies examined the association of the provision of supplementary grandchild care to grandparents’ psychological well-being, and the other eight studies analyzed the relations between specific characteristics of grandparents providing supplementary childcare and their own psychological well-being. The results suggested that the relationship between the provision of supplementary grandchild care and psychological well-being varies according to grandparents’ socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. race and co-residence with adult children), caregiving situations (e.g. types of care and activities with grandchildren), and indicators of social capital (e.g. familial relationships and social supports). This paper highlights the limitations of the theoretical frameworks that have been used to explain the relationship between the provision of supplementary grandchild care and grandparents’ psychological well-being in the studies that were reviewed, the strengths and limitations of related empirical research, and the lack of attention to diverse ethnic groups in reviewed studies. Suggestions for theory and future research are discussed based on these findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grandparent caregiving is an important social determinant of health.
“A growing body of literature highlights grandparent caregiving as an important social determinant of health (Danielsbacka et al., 2022; Kelley et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2016)”
From Grandparent Caregiving and Epigenetic Aging among Midlife and Older Adults in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2016
Cites
Goode, W. J. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092933 · Cited by 2,454 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Conversely, role strain theory proposes that an individual occupying multiple responsibilities is more likely to experience an increase in perceived strain, and consequently a decrease in health because of that person’s need to perform in multiple social roles (Goode, 1960).”
BackgroundThe Health Implications of Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China
Chen, F., & Liu, G. (2012) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr132 · Cited by 378 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Supplementary grandchild care is common in Asian countries such as China (Chen & Liu, 2012) and has become increasingly popular in many European countries (Di Gessa, Glaser, Price, © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group CONTACT Hye-Jin Kim hyejin@ku.edu Ribe, & Tinker, 2016; Hank & Buber, 2009; M…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ageism and Psychological Well-Being Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Kang, H., & Kim, H. (2022) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214221087023 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationChan, A. C. Y., Lee, S.-K., Zhang, J., Banegas, J., Marsalis, S., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2023) · The gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnac026 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Herrera, M. S., Galkuté, M., Fernández, M. B., & Elgueta, R. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114786 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Grandparent Caregiving and Epigenetic Aging among Midlife and Older Adults in the United States
Bhat, A. C., Trexberg, K. M., Apsley, A. T., Almeida, D. M., & Shalev, I. (2026) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf255 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, H.-J., Kang, H., & Johnson-Motoyama, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- ORCID
- Kang, Hyun
- Venue
- Journal of Family Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-141
- ISSN
- 1322-9400 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-3543
- OpenAlex
- W2462674632
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- grandparents, grandchild care, psychological well-being, caregiving, social capital, social support, ethnic diversity, family relationships, intergenerational caregiving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review