Cited by 23Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDiaspora, migration, transnational identityMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies

Care circulation and the so-called ‘elderly’: exploring care in 4G transnational Zhejianese families

Lamas-Abraira, Laura·2021·Journal of Family Studies

Abstract

Studies on care in Chinese transnational families often rely on bi-generational exchanges, failing to capture how care circulates within the families from a fully-generational perspective. The so-called ‘elderly’ is a key group for understanding care and mobility in these families; nevertheless, the existing research focuses either on their role as children caregivers or sees them as dependent people, resulting in a polarized perspective which also fails to understand the fluidity of care roles along the life course. Moreover, the generic term ‘the elderly’ may refer to one of several generations (grandparents/ great-grandparents). Based on qualitative data from a multi-sited ethnography (in China and Spain), this paper explores the circulation of care within four-generation transnational Zhejianese families. In these, the gendered construction of care work is the norm, despite the fact that new spaces for challenging specific gendered roles and practices are being created. In contrast, a high level of plurality and fluidity in care exchanges and care roles across generations, time and space has been observed. These factors are shaped, to different degrees, by local and transnational contexts, with the Chinese culture-system playing a key role. Finally, the paper highlights the contributions of the grandparents’ generation to families and society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13229400.2019.1641427

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most grandparents, particularly grandmothers, endure a high care burden even when their care work affects their physical and psychological health.

    “Review findings indicate that most grandparents, particularly grandmothers, endure a high care burden even when their care work affects their physical and psychological health (Hărăguş and Ionuţ Reference Hărăguş and Ionuţ2020; Lamas-Abraira Reference Lamas-Abraira2019; Sun Reference Sun2014; Treas and Mazumdar Reference Treas and Mazumdar2002).”

    From Transnational grandparent migration and care-giving: a systematic scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as Lamas-Abraira 2019

Authors
Lamas-Abraira, L.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Lamas-Abraira, Laura
Venue
Journal of Family Studies
Published
2019-07-10
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
460-478
ISSN
  • 1322-9400 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3543
OpenAlex
W2959590509
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MINECO
  • Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Keywords
transnational families, four-generation family, grandparents, intergenerational caregiving, gendered division of care, life course

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review