The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a European administrative space?
Abstract
Has there been a trend towards a "European administrative space', understood as convergence on a common European model? How can we recognize an EAS if one has emerged? A methodological purist can with good reason argue that we lack the concepts, methodology and data to answer such questions. A more pragmatic approach is to accept that the public administration is a key institution of government and that understanding administrative change is an important part of comprehending ongoing transformations in the European political order. So far no unitary administrative model has emerged and differentiation is still a core characteristic. Yet administrative variance and disparities have been reduced. Common institutions have been established. Domestic ones have been adapted to European standards and administrative law has been harmonized. The challenge then is to develop analytical models with explanatory power that gives a better comprehension of administrative change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, J.
- Venue
- Journal of European Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 506-531
- ISSN
- 1350-1763 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4429
- OpenAlex
- W1973071811
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a European administrative space? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1350176032000101244
- The paper
- Olsen, J. (2003). Towards a European administrative space? Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000101244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.