Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184European Union Policy and GovernanceInternational Environmental Law and PoliciesRegulation and Compliance Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Globalizing European Union environmental policy

Kelemen, R. Daniel·2010·Journal of European Public Policy
DOI 10.1080/13501761003662065
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This contribution explores the European Union's (EU) efforts to ‘globalize’ EU environmental regulation. EU leadership on global environmental governance emerged as a result of the combined effects of domestic politics and international regulatory competition. The growing power of environmental interests in Europe from the late 1980s, coupled with dynamics of EU policy-making, led the EU to commit to ambitious environmental policies. Given this commitment, it was in the EU's international competitive interests to support international agreements that would pressure other jurisdictions to adopt similar environmental regulations. Promoting treaties that spread EU environmental norms internationally also served to legitimize EU rules and to shield them from legal challenges before world trade bodies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13501761003662065

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Alden E., 2006, Financial Times
  2. Duchêne F., 1972, Europe Tomorrow
  3. Farrell M., 2007, Making History: The State of the European Union
  4. Mitchener B., 2002, Wall Street Journal
  5. Sbragia A., 2000, Policy-making in the European Union
  6. Sbragia A., 2000, Engaging Countries
  7. Shaffer G., 2002, Columbia Journal of European Law, 9, 29
  8. Stoler, A. The Doha round negotiations on the MEA-WTO interface. Paper presented at the International Bar Association Conference. October26. Auckland, NZ
  9. Vogel D., 1995, Trading Up
  10. Yandle B., 2002, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 26, 177

Cited by

Items 101–184 of 184

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kelemen, R. D.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Kelemen, R. Daniel
ORCID
Kelemen, R. Daniel
Venue
Journal of European Public Policy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-04
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
335-349
ISSN
  • 1350-1763 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4429
DOI
10.1080/13501761003662065
OpenAlex
W2168909780
Cited by
165
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
64.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of European Public Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
EU environmental policy, global environmental governance, environmental interests, EU policy-making, international environmental agreements, environmental norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.