CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,000Climate Change Communication and PerceptionPro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people

Ojala, Maria·2012·Environmental Education Research
DOI 10.1080/13504622.2011.637157
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although many young people think climate change is an important societal issue, studies indicate that pessimism is quite common. Finding ways to instill hope could therefore be seen as vital. However, is hope positively related to engagement or is it only a sign of illusory optimism? The aim of the study was to explore if hope concerning climate change has a significant relation to pro-environmental behavior as well as an impact on behavior when controlling for already well-known predictors such as values, social influence, knowledge, and gender. Two questionnaire studies were performed, one with a group of Swedish teenagers (n = 723) and one with a group of Swedish young adults (n = 381). ‘Constructive’ hope had a unique positive influence on pro-environmental behavior. Hope based on denial, however, was negatively correlated with pro-environmental behavior in the two samples and was a significant negative predictor in the teenage group. The conclusion is that hope is not only a pleasant feeling but could also work as a motivational force, if one controls for denial. Implications for education concerning sustainable development are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Colby A., 2007, Educating for democracy
  2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2009. Green at fifteen? How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA 2006 . Programme for International Student Assessment. · DOI
  3. Sandilands C., 1993, Canadian Women Studies, 13, 45

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ojala, M.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ojala, Maria
ORCID
Ojala, Maria
Venue
Environmental Education Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-10
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
625-642
ISSN
  • 1350-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5871
DOI
10.1080/13504622.2011.637157
OpenAlex
W2141554808
Cited by
988
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 188 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
35.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Education Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Energy Foundation
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
hope, climate change, pro-environmental behavior, environmental engagement, youth, adolescents, young adults, climate change denial, pessimism, motivation, sustainability education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review