The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?
Abstract
We introduce ‘cultural distance’ as a measure of the degree to which shared norms and values in one country differ from those in another country, and employ a modified gravity specification to examine whether such cultural differences affect the volume of trade flows. Employing data for US state-level exports to the 75 trading partners for which measures of cultural distance can be constructed, we find that greater cultural differences between the United States and a trading partner reduces state-level exports to that country. This result holds for aggregate exports, cultural and noncultural products exports as well, but with significantly different magnitudes. Immigrants are found to exert a pro-export effect that partially offsets the trade-inhibiting effects of cultural distance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cultural proximity is known to be a key determinant for economic flows for people, goods, financial investments in gravity models - people prefer to live with, trade with and invest in what is closer to their own identity (i.e. the home bias effect) (Tadesse and White 2010).”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2021) · cites this paper as Tadesse and White 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bandyopadhyay, S., Coughlin, C.C., and Wall, H.J. (2006) Ethnic Networks and US Exports, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2005-069A · DOI
- Doz Y. L., 1998, Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering
- 10.1006/jjie.1994.1025 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872679404700404 · DOI
- 10.2307/136376 · DOI
- Hofstede G., 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations, Across Nations
- United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2006, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2006
- Wagner D., 2002, Journal of Political Economy, 49, 507
- 10.1080/00036840500447849 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Metadata
- Authors
- Tadesse, B., & White, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
- Franklin & Marshall College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tadesse, Bedassa
- Venue
- Applied Economics Letters
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 1350-4851 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4291
- OpenAlex
- W2063462387
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
- Keywords
- cultural distance, bilateral trade, trade flows, cultural differences, immigrants, gravity model, state-level exports, cultural products, United States exports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
