Your cheatin’ heart: joint production, joint consumption and the likelihood of extramarital sex
Abstract
Using data from the General Social Survey (GSS), we model the probability of engaging in Extramarital Sex (EMS) with a focus on variables that allow us to discern evidence of assortative mating. We find that couples with the same religion and both having high levels of education are less likely to engage in EMS. We also find that work status matters: those who are employed are more likely to cheat if their spouses are not working.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cohabitation before marriage is positively associated with infidelity.
“Interestingly, cohabitation before marriage was found to be positively associated with infidelity [84].”
From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [84]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Infidelity in romantic relationships
Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences
Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20053904 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brooks, T. J., & Monaco, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
- California State University, Long Beach (US)
- Corresponding author
- Monaco, Kristen
- ORCID
- Brooks, Taggert J.
- Venue
- Applied Economics Letters
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-05-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272-275
- ISSN
- 1350-4851 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4291
- OpenAlex
- W2090443954
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- adultery, cheating, assortative mating, joint production, joint consumption, employment status, marital relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review